Federalism Re-Constructed: the Eleventh Amendment's Illogical Impact on Congress' Power

Marcia L. McCormick
{"title":"Federalism Re-Constructed: the Eleventh Amendment's Illogical Impact on Congress' Power","authors":"Marcia L. McCormick","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.446720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitution is designed to protect individual liberty and equality by diffusing power among the three branches of the federal government and between the federal and state governments, and by providing a minimum level of protection for individual rights. Yet, the Supreme Court seems to think that federalism is about protecting states as states rather than balancing governmental power to protect individuals. In the name of federalism, the Supreme Court has been paring away at Congress' power to enact civil rights legislation. In doing so, it has transformed the Fourteenth Amendment into a vehicle for protecting states rights rather than a vehicle for protecting individual rights. This paper analyzes this process and the institutional competence and separation of powers problems that have resulted. It proposes that the Court give effect to Congress' powers to deter potential constitutional violations by states under the Fourteenth Amendment and to keep in mind that federalism's purpose should be to maximize equality and liberty.","PeriodicalId":448271,"journal":{"name":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.446720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Constitution is designed to protect individual liberty and equality by diffusing power among the three branches of the federal government and between the federal and state governments, and by providing a minimum level of protection for individual rights. Yet, the Supreme Court seems to think that federalism is about protecting states as states rather than balancing governmental power to protect individuals. In the name of federalism, the Supreme Court has been paring away at Congress' power to enact civil rights legislation. In doing so, it has transformed the Fourteenth Amendment into a vehicle for protecting states rights rather than a vehicle for protecting individual rights. This paper analyzes this process and the institutional competence and separation of powers problems that have resulted. It proposes that the Court give effect to Congress' powers to deter potential constitutional violations by states under the Fourteenth Amendment and to keep in mind that federalism's purpose should be to maximize equality and liberty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重构的联邦制:第十一修正案对国会权力的不合逻辑的影响
宪法旨在通过在联邦政府的三个部门之间以及联邦政府和州政府之间分散权力,并为个人权利提供最低限度的保护,来保护个人自由和平等。然而,最高法院似乎认为,联邦制是保护作为州的州,而不是平衡政府权力来保护个人。在联邦主义的名义下,最高法院一直在削减国会制定民权立法的权力。这样一来,它就把第十四修正案变成了保护各州权利的工具,而不是保护个人权利的工具。本文分析了这一过程以及由此产生的制度权限和三权分立问题。它建议最高法院行使国会的权力,以阻止各州根据第十四修正案可能违反宪法的行为,并牢记联邦制的目的应该是最大限度地实现平等和自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of 'Affirmative Action' Labor Restructuring in China's Industrial Sector: Towards a Functioning Urban Labor Market Wage and Employment Effects of Immigration to Germany: Evidence from a Skill Group Approach Fixed Term Employment Contracts in an Equilibrium Search Model The American Experience with Exclusive Representation: Implications for the Issue of Plural Unionism in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1