Impact of Porter’s Generic Strategy on Firm Performance with reference to Nepalese Retail Banking Sector

{"title":"Impact of Porter’s Generic Strategy on Firm Performance with reference to Nepalese Retail Banking Sector","authors":"","doi":"10.53056/njmsr-2021.001.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Porter’s generic strategies are the proven and pervasive strategic options in achieving competitiveness and better firm performance. This paper aims in examining the effect of Porter’s generic strategies (low-cost, differentiation, and focus) on firm performance in the context of Nepalese retail banks, a more competitive service industry. This study applies casual comparative research design and the data have been collected through administering questionnaire survey from 75 senior bank managers of 18 Nepalese commercial banks who being engaged in strategic affairs. The econometric model has been constructed to measure the expected effect of the strategies on firm performance. The descriptive analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multivariate regression analysis were conducted. The empirical results of correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis produced consistent results indicating positive associations between generic strategies and firm performance. The empirical results from regression analysis declared higher positive and significant impact of low-cost on firm performance. Similarly, positive effect of differentiation strategy and focus strategy on firm performance was reported. The findings suggested that pursuing low cost strategy provides more financial returns with comparison to differentiation and focus strategies. The finding also suggested for combination of low-cost and differentiation (and focus) strategies could provide better competitiveness and firm performance.\n\nKeywords: Generic Strategy, Low-cost strategy, Differentiation strategy, Focus strategy, Firm performance","PeriodicalId":350680,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Management Science and Research","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Management Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53056/njmsr-2021.001.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Porter’s generic strategies are the proven and pervasive strategic options in achieving competitiveness and better firm performance. This paper aims in examining the effect of Porter’s generic strategies (low-cost, differentiation, and focus) on firm performance in the context of Nepalese retail banks, a more competitive service industry. This study applies casual comparative research design and the data have been collected through administering questionnaire survey from 75 senior bank managers of 18 Nepalese commercial banks who being engaged in strategic affairs. The econometric model has been constructed to measure the expected effect of the strategies on firm performance. The descriptive analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multivariate regression analysis were conducted. The empirical results of correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis produced consistent results indicating positive associations between generic strategies and firm performance. The empirical results from regression analysis declared higher positive and significant impact of low-cost on firm performance. Similarly, positive effect of differentiation strategy and focus strategy on firm performance was reported. The findings suggested that pursuing low cost strategy provides more financial returns with comparison to differentiation and focus strategies. The finding also suggested for combination of low-cost and differentiation (and focus) strategies could provide better competitiveness and firm performance. Keywords: Generic Strategy, Low-cost strategy, Differentiation strategy, Focus strategy, Firm performance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波特的一般策略对企业绩效的影响,以尼泊尔零售银行业为例
波特的通用战略是在实现竞争力和更好的企业绩效的证明和普遍的战略选择。本文旨在研究波特的通用策略(低成本、差异化和专注)在尼泊尔零售银行这一竞争更激烈的服务业背景下对企业绩效的影响。本研究采用随机比较研究设计,对尼泊尔18家商业银行75名从事战略事务的高级银行经理进行问卷调查。构建了计量经济模型来衡量战略对企业绩效的预期影响。进行描述性分析、Pearson相关分析和多元回归分析。相关分析和多元回归分析的实证结果一致表明,通用战略与企业绩效呈正相关。回归分析的实证结果表明,低成本对企业绩效有较高的正向显著影响。同样,差异化战略和聚焦战略对企业绩效也有正向影响。研究结果表明,与差异化和聚焦战略相比,追求低成本战略提供了更多的财务回报。研究结果还表明,低成本与差异化(和聚焦)战略相结合可以提供更好的竞争力和企业绩效。关键词:通用战略、低成本战略、差异化战略、聚焦战略、企业绩效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Workers’ Remittances on Household Consumption Expenditure in Nepal: A Time Series Analysis The Success of Entrepreneurship Education in Tafarkin Tsira Islamic Center Azare of Bauchi State, Nigeria Talent Management Practices and Organizational Performance: Mediation Role of Organizational Commitment An Exploration of Influencing Factors of Customer Relationship Management Practices in the Banking Sector Capital Structure Choice and the Firm Value in The Indian Automobile Sector: An Empirical Exploration Using Panel Threshold Regression Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1