Lab-Sophistication: Does Repeated Participation in Laboratory Experiments Affect Pro-Social Behaviour?

Medda Tiziana, Pelligra Vittorio, Reggiani Tommaso
{"title":"Lab-Sophistication: Does Repeated Participation in Laboratory Experiments Affect Pro-Social Behaviour?","authors":"Medda Tiziana, Pelligra Vittorio, Reggiani Tommaso","doi":"10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2021-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimental social scientists working at research-intensive institutions deal inevitably with subjects who have most likely participated in previous experiments. It is an important methodological question to know whether participants that have acquired a high level of lab-sophistication show altered pro-social behavioral patterns. In this paper, we focus both on the potential effect of the subjects’ lab-sophistication, and on the role of the knowledge about the level of lab-sophistication of the other participants. Our main findings show that while lab-sophistication per se does not significantly affect pro-social behaviour, for sophisticated sub-jects the knowledge about thecounterpart’s level of (un)sophistication may systematically alter their choices. This result should induce caution among experimenters about whether, in their settings, information about lab-sophistication can be inferred by the participants, due to the characteristics of the recruitment mechanisms, the management of the experimental sessions or to other contextual clues.","PeriodicalId":188529,"journal":{"name":"MUNI ECON Working Papers","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUNI ECON Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2021-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Experimental social scientists working at research-intensive institutions deal inevitably with subjects who have most likely participated in previous experiments. It is an important methodological question to know whether participants that have acquired a high level of lab-sophistication show altered pro-social behavioral patterns. In this paper, we focus both on the potential effect of the subjects’ lab-sophistication, and on the role of the knowledge about the level of lab-sophistication of the other participants. Our main findings show that while lab-sophistication per se does not significantly affect pro-social behaviour, for sophisticated sub-jects the knowledge about thecounterpart’s level of (un)sophistication may systematically alter their choices. This result should induce caution among experimenters about whether, in their settings, information about lab-sophistication can be inferred by the participants, due to the characteristics of the recruitment mechanisms, the management of the experimental sessions or to other contextual clues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验室复杂性:重复参与实验室实验是否会影响亲社会行为?
在研究密集型机构工作的实验社会科学家不可避免地要处理那些最有可能参加过以前实验的对象。这是一个重要的方法论问题,以了解参与者是否已经获得了高水平的实验室复杂性显示改变亲社会的行为模式。在本文中,我们既关注受试者实验室复杂程度的潜在影响,也关注关于其他参与者实验室复杂程度的知识的作用。我们的主要发现表明,虽然实验室的复杂程度本身并不会显著影响亲社会行为,但对于复杂的受试者来说,了解对方的(非)复杂程度可能会系统性地改变他们的选择。由于招募机制的特点、实验环节的管理或其他背景线索,这一结果应引起实验者的注意,在他们的设置中,参与者是否可以推断出有关实验室复杂性的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Life Dissatisfaction and Anxiety in COVID-19 pandemic Narratives on migration and political polarization: How the emphasis in narratives can drive us apart Empirical investigation into market power, markups and employment Group identification and giving: in-group love, out-group hate and their crowding out Residential-based discrimination in the labor market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1