Analysis of the Online Support Systems for Curriculum Organization and Implementation in Korea

Sung Hye Kim, Young-sun Yoon, Eun-Hee Noh, Soyeon Park
{"title":"Analysis of the Online Support Systems for Curriculum Organization\n and Implementation in Korea","authors":"Sung Hye Kim, Young-sun Yoon, Eun-Hee Noh, Soyeon Park","doi":"10.29221/JCE.2021.24.1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the following five websites operated by government for public interest: ‘National Curriculum Information Center’, ‘Edunet T-clear’, ‘School Information’, ‘Student Evaluation Support Portal,’ and ‘High School Credit System’. In order to examine the use of the five curriculum online support systems, a total of 3,391 teachers (860 elementary school, 1,223 middle school, and 1,308 high school) who are the target users of the systems were surveyed. The results of the survey were as follows. First, the main means for acquiring curriculum information was through ‘online systems operated by government’, with the highest user rate at 40.8%. Second, curriculum online support systems were utilized the most in the order of ‘School Information’, ‘National Curriculum Information Center’, ‘Edunet T-clear’, ‘Student Evaluation Support Portal’, and ‘High School Credit System’. Third, the reason for using an online curriculum support system was to plan the curriculum, which was the reason ranked in the top three for all the sites. It was found that ‘National Curriculum Information Center’ and ‘High School Credit System’ are mainly being used to understand the national curriculum, when setting the direction for school curriculums. For an in-depth analysis on the use of curriculum online support systems, a monitoring group of 25 educational officers in cities and provinces and 51 elementary/middle/high school teachers (total of 76) was formed. The study suggested what menus, functions, and practices for curriculum organization and implementation need to be supplemented or added to the five websites.","PeriodicalId":198625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29221/JCE.2021.24.1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the following five websites operated by government for public interest: ‘National Curriculum Information Center’, ‘Edunet T-clear’, ‘School Information’, ‘Student Evaluation Support Portal,’ and ‘High School Credit System’. In order to examine the use of the five curriculum online support systems, a total of 3,391 teachers (860 elementary school, 1,223 middle school, and 1,308 high school) who are the target users of the systems were surveyed. The results of the survey were as follows. First, the main means for acquiring curriculum information was through ‘online systems operated by government’, with the highest user rate at 40.8%. Second, curriculum online support systems were utilized the most in the order of ‘School Information’, ‘National Curriculum Information Center’, ‘Edunet T-clear’, ‘Student Evaluation Support Portal’, and ‘High School Credit System’. Third, the reason for using an online curriculum support system was to plan the curriculum, which was the reason ranked in the top three for all the sites. It was found that ‘National Curriculum Information Center’ and ‘High School Credit System’ are mainly being used to understand the national curriculum, when setting the direction for school curriculums. For an in-depth analysis on the use of curriculum online support systems, a monitoring group of 25 educational officers in cities and provinces and 51 elementary/middle/high school teachers (total of 76) was formed. The study suggested what menus, functions, and practices for curriculum organization and implementation need to be supplemented or added to the five websites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国在线课程组织与实施支持系统分析
本研究考察了以下五个由政府运营的公共利益网站:“国家课程信息中心”、“Edunet T-clear”、“学校信息”、“学生评价支持门户”和“高中学分系统”。为了调查这5个在线课程支持系统的使用情况,对目标用户3391名教师(860名小学、1223名初中、1308名高中)进行了问卷调查。调查结果如下。首先,获取课程信息的主要手段是通过“政府运营的在线系统”,用户比例最高,为40.8%。其次,课程在线支持系统的使用率依次为“学校信息”、“国家课程信息中心”、“Edunet T-clear”、“学生评价支持门户”和“高中学分制”。第三,使用在线课程支持系统的原因是为了规划课程,这是在所有网站中排名前三的原因。调查发现,“国家课程信息中心”和“高中学分制”主要用于了解国家课程,为学校课程制定方向。为了深入分析课程在线支持系统的使用情况,成立了一个由25名市道教育官员和51名小学/初中/高中教师(共76人)组成的监测小组。该研究提出了五个网站在课程组织和实施方面需要补充或增加哪些菜单、功能和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Validation of Teacher's Educational Text readability Evaluation through a Cloze Test for Elementary and Middle School Students Exploration of motor development evidence reflected in the content system of the 2022 revised physical education curriculum and Derivation of future tasks Exploring high school students' formative assessment perception types and influencing factors in Korean language classes Analysis of Trends in Mathematics Achievement of Korean Middle School Students in the Recent 5 Cycles of TIMSS A study on the evaluation of foundational literacy with the case of BC, Canada and Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1