A Small-States Perspective on the European Citizens' Initiative

Maximilian Conrad
{"title":"A Small-States Perspective on the European Citizens' Initiative","authors":"Maximilian Conrad","doi":"10.13177/IRPA.A.2013.9.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) in the Lisbon Treaty has given the European Union (EU) its strongest element of transnational participatory democracy to date. One million EU citizens from at least seven different member states can now request legislative proposals from the European Commission. This article discusses the ECI from a small-states perspective, assessing its impact on the role of small-state citizens in the union. The theoretical argument draws both on the international relations literature on small states and on James Bohman’s work on transnational democracy, suggesting that the ECI is a particularly fruitful tool that gives EU citizens an institutional incentive for initiating deliberation on perceived injustices. The empirical argument presents the findings of a quantitative analysis of the organizers of the first sixteen initiatives, suggesting that the ECI is indeed a tool used by citizens from the union’s smaller states. However, the analysis also shows that state size can and should be conceptualized not merely in terms of traditional indicators such as most importantly population size, but also in terms of constructivist notions of perceptual size.","PeriodicalId":294103,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2013.9.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The introduction of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) in the Lisbon Treaty has given the European Union (EU) its strongest element of transnational participatory democracy to date. One million EU citizens from at least seven different member states can now request legislative proposals from the European Commission. This article discusses the ECI from a small-states perspective, assessing its impact on the role of small-state citizens in the union. The theoretical argument draws both on the international relations literature on small states and on James Bohman’s work on transnational democracy, suggesting that the ECI is a particularly fruitful tool that gives EU citizens an institutional incentive for initiating deliberation on perceived injustices. The empirical argument presents the findings of a quantitative analysis of the organizers of the first sixteen initiatives, suggesting that the ECI is indeed a tool used by citizens from the union’s smaller states. However, the analysis also shows that state size can and should be conceptualized not merely in terms of traditional indicators such as most importantly population size, but also in terms of constructivist notions of perceptual size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从小国视角看欧洲公民倡议
《里斯本条约》中引入的欧洲公民倡议(ECI)赋予了欧洲联盟(EU)迄今为止最强大的跨国参与式民主元素。来自至少7个不同成员国的100万欧盟公民现在可以向欧盟委员会提出立法建议。本文从小国的角度讨论了ECI,评估了它对小国公民在欧盟中的作用的影响。理论论点既借鉴了有关小国的国际关系文献,也借鉴了詹姆斯·博曼(James Bohman)关于跨国民主的著作,认为欧盟国际指数是一个特别富有成效的工具,它给欧盟公民提供了一种制度性激励,促使他们开始审议自己所感受到的不公正。实证论证提出了对前16项倡议的组织者进行定量分析的结果,表明ECI确实是欧盟较小国家公民使用的工具。然而,分析还表明,国家规模不仅可以而且应该根据传统指标(如最重要的人口规模)概念化,而且还可以根据感性规模的建构主义概念概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Word I Hate: Racism, Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Iceland Leadership for experts: First among equals Tourists and municipal finance Young people’s views on political participation The opening of Costco in Iceland: Unexpected meanings of globalized phenomenon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1