Schemes of Arrangement in Malaysia: Pre & Post 2010

S. Alam, Mohammed Dulal
{"title":"Schemes of Arrangement in Malaysia: Pre & Post 2010","authors":"S. Alam, Mohammed Dulal","doi":"10.9790/487X-16322028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schemes of arrangement can be used as an easier vehicle in a corporate acquisition. An approved scheme is binding on all including shareholders. The issue is how shareholders particularly minority in target company can be treated under a scheme. The main objective of this paper is to analyze key changes of legal framework of schemes of arrangement after coming new Code in force, and to evaluate the rights of minority shareholders in a scheme of arrangement which results in the transfer of control of a company. It further attempts briefly to acquire basic understanding of schemes as well as to consider certain factors, in the form of pros, which may make a scheme more attractive than an offer, and some disadvantages which may make it more appropriate for a bidder to proceed with a takeover by way of an offer. This writing is mostly analytical in nature, and largely based on secondary materials like books, articles, and several online writings. Primary sources of law including certain foreign judicial decisions have also been used in this paper. The scope of this article is limited as it is going to concentrate on only the use scheme of arrangement for takeover purpose and mainly within Malaysian legal authority. Scheme proposed between company and its creditors is also beyond the ambit of this writing. It does not want to argue that whether treatment of all involved in a scheme is fair rather it seeks to extend the debate in a new direction by stating rights of shareholders including minority are being protected under a scheme of arrangement especially after changes.","PeriodicalId":117639,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Takeover Law (Topic)","volume":"676 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Takeover Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-16322028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schemes of arrangement can be used as an easier vehicle in a corporate acquisition. An approved scheme is binding on all including shareholders. The issue is how shareholders particularly minority in target company can be treated under a scheme. The main objective of this paper is to analyze key changes of legal framework of schemes of arrangement after coming new Code in force, and to evaluate the rights of minority shareholders in a scheme of arrangement which results in the transfer of control of a company. It further attempts briefly to acquire basic understanding of schemes as well as to consider certain factors, in the form of pros, which may make a scheme more attractive than an offer, and some disadvantages which may make it more appropriate for a bidder to proceed with a takeover by way of an offer. This writing is mostly analytical in nature, and largely based on secondary materials like books, articles, and several online writings. Primary sources of law including certain foreign judicial decisions have also been used in this paper. The scope of this article is limited as it is going to concentrate on only the use scheme of arrangement for takeover purpose and mainly within Malaysian legal authority. Scheme proposed between company and its creditors is also beyond the ambit of this writing. It does not want to argue that whether treatment of all involved in a scheme is fair rather it seeks to extend the debate in a new direction by stating rights of shareholders including minority are being protected under a scheme of arrangement especially after changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚的安排方案:2010年前后
在公司收购中,安排方案可以作为一种更容易的工具。经批准的方案对包括股东在内的所有人都具有约束力。问题在于,根据一项计划,目标公司的股东(尤其是少数股东)将如何得到对待。本文的主要目的是分析新法规生效后安排方案法律框架的主要变化,并评估导致公司控制权转移的安排方案中少数股东的权利。它进一步尝试简单地获得对方案的基本理解,并考虑某些因素,以优点的形式,这可能使方案比要约更有吸引力,以及一些缺点,这可能使它更适合投标人通过要约的方式进行收购。这种写作本质上主要是分析性的,主要基于书籍、文章和一些在线文章等二手材料。本文还使用了包括某些外国司法判决在内的主要法律渊源。这篇文章的范围是有限的,因为它将集中在收购目的的安排的使用方案,主要是在马来西亚的法律权威范围内。公司与其债权人之间提出的方案也不在本文讨论范围之内。它并不想争论一项计划中涉及的所有人的待遇是否公平,而是试图通过声明包括少数股东在内的股东的权利在一项安排计划下受到保护,特别是在变化之后,将辩论扩展到一个新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Competition Laws and Earnings Management: International Evidence Deal Structure Takeover Bids’ Profile Under Mandatory Bid Rule: Evidence from an Emerging Market Speed in Decision-Making: An Assessment of the Australian Takeovers Panel Takeover Litigation in 2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1