Conventional and Non-conventional Job Interviewing Methods: A Comparative Study in Two Countries

K. Shubham, E. Kleinlogel, Anaïs Butera, M. S. Mast, D. Jayagopi
{"title":"Conventional and Non-conventional Job Interviewing Methods: A Comparative Study in Two Countries","authors":"K. Shubham, E. Kleinlogel, Anaïs Butera, M. S. Mast, D. Jayagopi","doi":"10.1145/3382507.3418824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With recent advancements in technology, new platforms have come up to substitute face-to-face interviews. Of particular interest are asynchronous video interviewing (AVI) platforms, where candidates talk to a screen with questions, and virtual agent based interviewing platforms, where a human-like avatar interviews candidates. These anytime-anywhere interviewing systems scale up the overall reach of the interviewing process for firms, though they may not provide the best experience for the candidates. An important research question is how the candidates perceive such platforms and its impact on their performance and behavior. Also, is there an advantage of one setting vs. another i.e., Avatar vs. Platform? Finally, would such differences be consistent across cultures? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative study conducted in three different interview settings (i.e., Face-to-face, Avatar, and Platform), as well as two different cultural contexts (i.e., India and Switzerland), and analyze the differences in self-rated, others-rated performance, and automatic audiovisual behavioral cues.","PeriodicalId":402394,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

With recent advancements in technology, new platforms have come up to substitute face-to-face interviews. Of particular interest are asynchronous video interviewing (AVI) platforms, where candidates talk to a screen with questions, and virtual agent based interviewing platforms, where a human-like avatar interviews candidates. These anytime-anywhere interviewing systems scale up the overall reach of the interviewing process for firms, though they may not provide the best experience for the candidates. An important research question is how the candidates perceive such platforms and its impact on their performance and behavior. Also, is there an advantage of one setting vs. another i.e., Avatar vs. Platform? Finally, would such differences be consistent across cultures? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative study conducted in three different interview settings (i.e., Face-to-face, Avatar, and Platform), as well as two different cultural contexts (i.e., India and Switzerland), and analyze the differences in self-rated, others-rated performance, and automatic audiovisual behavioral cues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两国传统与非传统工作面试方法的比较研究
随着科技的进步,新的平台代替了面对面的面试。特别令人感兴趣的是异步视频面试(AVI)平台,候选人对着屏幕提问,以及基于虚拟代理的面试平台,其中类似人类的化身面试候选人。这些随时随地的面试系统扩大了公司面试过程的整体范围,尽管它们可能不会为候选人提供最好的体验。一个重要的研究问题是候选人如何看待这些平台及其对他们的表现和行为的影响。另外,一种场景vs另一种场景是否有优势,比如化身vs平台?最后,这些差异在不同文化中是否一致?在本文中,我们介绍了在三种不同的面试环境(即面对面、化身和平台)以及两种不同的文化背景(即印度和瑞士)中进行的比较研究结果,并分析了自评、他人评和自动视听行为线索的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OpenSense: A Platform for Multimodal Data Acquisition and Behavior Perception Human-centered Multimodal Machine Intelligence Touch Recognition with Attentive End-to-End Model MORSE: MultimOdal sentiment analysis for Real-life SEttings Temporal Attention and Consistency Measuring for Video Question Answering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1