An Evidence-Supported Medical Laboratory Science Program Admissions Selection Process

Janice M. Conway-Klaassen
{"title":"An Evidence-Supported Medical Laboratory Science Program Admissions Selection Process","authors":"Janice M. Conway-Klaassen","doi":"10.29074/ascls.29.4.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a recent enrollment expansion, a Medical Laboratory Science program experienced a higher than desired student attrition rate due to a number of academic and non-academic student readiness factors. In an attempt to address retention and other issues, the program completed a curriculum update and revision as well as a conversion to a hybrid or flipped classroom delivery model, but in spite of an overall improvement in student learning outcomes, the program still experienced a high level of student attrition. Program faculty then developed and implemented a two stage holistic admissions selection process, which included an interview and skills test, in an attempt to assess candidate background knowledge and abilities in an equitable manner. Comparison of student factors associated with on-time successful graduation, probation (delayed graduation), or dismissal from the program indicated that the science and prerequisite science grade point averages were significantly higher for students who graduated on-time compared to delayed or non-successful (dismissed) students. Review of applicants' performance in the interview and skills test showed significant differences for multiple factors for students who graduated on-time from the program compared to delayed (probation) and non-successful (dismissed) students. Continuing reviews of program retention rates are needed, however the attrition rate for the next cohort dropped from 24% to 4% when the program focused the selection process on factors shown to be associated with successful graduation. ABBREVIATIONS: MCAT - Medical College Admission Test, ACT – American College Test, SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test, GPA – Grade Point Average, AHPAT – Allied Health Professions Admission Test, MLS – Medical Laboratory Sciences, ANOVA - Analysis of variance, sGPA - Science GPA, preGPA – Prerequisite science course GPA, TOEFL - Test of English as a Foreign Language, PPB – Purdue Pegboard","PeriodicalId":263458,"journal":{"name":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.29.4.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After a recent enrollment expansion, a Medical Laboratory Science program experienced a higher than desired student attrition rate due to a number of academic and non-academic student readiness factors. In an attempt to address retention and other issues, the program completed a curriculum update and revision as well as a conversion to a hybrid or flipped classroom delivery model, but in spite of an overall improvement in student learning outcomes, the program still experienced a high level of student attrition. Program faculty then developed and implemented a two stage holistic admissions selection process, which included an interview and skills test, in an attempt to assess candidate background knowledge and abilities in an equitable manner. Comparison of student factors associated with on-time successful graduation, probation (delayed graduation), or dismissal from the program indicated that the science and prerequisite science grade point averages were significantly higher for students who graduated on-time compared to delayed or non-successful (dismissed) students. Review of applicants' performance in the interview and skills test showed significant differences for multiple factors for students who graduated on-time from the program compared to delayed (probation) and non-successful (dismissed) students. Continuing reviews of program retention rates are needed, however the attrition rate for the next cohort dropped from 24% to 4% when the program focused the selection process on factors shown to be associated with successful graduation. ABBREVIATIONS: MCAT - Medical College Admission Test, ACT – American College Test, SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test, GPA – Grade Point Average, AHPAT – Allied Health Professions Admission Test, MLS – Medical Laboratory Sciences, ANOVA - Analysis of variance, sGPA - Science GPA, preGPA – Prerequisite science course GPA, TOEFL - Test of English as a Foreign Language, PPB – Purdue Pegboard
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循证医学实验室科学项目招生选择过程
在最近的招生扩张之后,由于一些学术和非学术的学生准备因素,医学实验室科学项目经历了比预期更高的学生流失率。为了解决保留和其他问题,该项目完成了课程的更新和修订,以及向混合或翻转课堂交付模式的转变,但尽管学生学习成果总体上有所改善,该项目仍然经历了高水平的学生流失。项目教师随后制定并实施了两阶段的全面招生选拔过程,包括面试和技能测试,试图以公平的方式评估候选人的背景知识和能力。与准时成功毕业、留校察看(延迟毕业)或开除相关的学生因素的比较表明,与延迟或不成功(开除)的学生相比,准时毕业的学生的科学和先决科学平均成绩显着更高。申请人在面试和技能测试中的表现表明,与延迟(试用期)和不成功(解雇)的学生相比,按时毕业的学生在多个因素上存在显著差异。需要持续评估项目的保留率,然而,当项目将选择过程集中在与成功毕业相关的因素上时,下一届学员的流失率从24%降至4%。缩写:MCAT -医学院入学考试,ACT -美国大学入学考试,SAT -学术能力倾向测试,GPA -平均成绩,AHPAT -联合卫生专业入学考试,MLS -医学实验室科学,ANOVA -方差分析,sGPA -科学GPA, preGPA -先决科学课程GPA,托福-英语作为外语考试,PPB -普度大学挂板
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influences of Patient Characteristics on the Predictive Value of Molecular Biomarkers of Colon Cancer in Tubular Adenomas Molecular Action of ADAMTS-13 and Transfusion Therapies of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Presence of Group B Streptococcus in Raw and Dehydrated Placentas Leveraging Creativity to Teach Science: Incorporating Sketchnotes in Medical Laboratory Science Curriculum Demonstration of the Nanopore MinION DNA Sequencer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1