{"title":"Comment Letter on the Need for Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure","authors":"J. Brown","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2847197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed revisions to the disclosure process. See Concept Release, Exchange Act Release No. 77599 (April 13, 2016). Among other things, the Commission requested comments on the disclosure of environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. The attached letter analyzes the comment letters, concluding that the letters for the most part reflect a consensus on three basic points: (1) The existing reporting regime with respect to ESG disclosure does not adequately meet the needs of shareholders and other investors. While some commenters believe that the problem can be solved through increased guidance and enforcement by the Commission, most do not. Instead, changes to the disclosure regime are needed; (2) In addition to ensuring the disclosure of material information (however defined), SEC requirements should be designed to promote uniformity, reliability and comparability of ESG disclosure; and (3) agreement exists on the need for a more robust regime for the disclosure relating to a company’s sustainability, with such analysis taking into account sustainability over a longer term horizon than is typically the case, address ESG issues where relevant, and include a qualitative analysis of efforts to reduce or remediate threats to sustainability. The letter analyzes the definition of materiality, concluding that the term is not limited to matters that will have a significant effect on earnings or operations in the short term. The letter further notes that the disclosure system is also built around the need for comparability, an approach that is not dependent upon the need to show the materiality of the information. To address the areas of consensus by commenters supporting increased ESG disclosure, the Commission should provide additional guidance on the applicability of existing disclosure obligations to ESG matters, adopt a prescriptive regime that requires disclosure of specific ESG matters that are important to broad segments of the investor community and common to all or most public companies, and add an additional Item to Regulation S-K that specifically addresses sustainability primarily through a principles based disclosure regime.","PeriodicalId":181062,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2847197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed revisions to the disclosure process. See Concept Release, Exchange Act Release No. 77599 (April 13, 2016). Among other things, the Commission requested comments on the disclosure of environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. The attached letter analyzes the comment letters, concluding that the letters for the most part reflect a consensus on three basic points: (1) The existing reporting regime with respect to ESG disclosure does not adequately meet the needs of shareholders and other investors. While some commenters believe that the problem can be solved through increased guidance and enforcement by the Commission, most do not. Instead, changes to the disclosure regime are needed; (2) In addition to ensuring the disclosure of material information (however defined), SEC requirements should be designed to promote uniformity, reliability and comparability of ESG disclosure; and (3) agreement exists on the need for a more robust regime for the disclosure relating to a company’s sustainability, with such analysis taking into account sustainability over a longer term horizon than is typically the case, address ESG issues where relevant, and include a qualitative analysis of efforts to reduce or remediate threats to sustainability. The letter analyzes the definition of materiality, concluding that the term is not limited to matters that will have a significant effect on earnings or operations in the short term. The letter further notes that the disclosure system is also built around the need for comparability, an approach that is not dependent upon the need to show the materiality of the information. To address the areas of consensus by commenters supporting increased ESG disclosure, the Commission should provide additional guidance on the applicability of existing disclosure obligations to ESG matters, adopt a prescriptive regime that requires disclosure of specific ESG matters that are important to broad segments of the investor community and common to all or most public companies, and add an additional Item to Regulation S-K that specifically addresses sustainability primarily through a principles based disclosure regime.
美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission)已提议修改信息披露程序。参见概念发布,交易所法案发布号77599(2016年4月13日)。除其他事项外,委员会要求就披露环境、社会和治理(ESG)事项发表评论。本文对这些意见书进行了分析,得出结论认为,这些意见书大多反映了三个基本观点的共识:(1)现有的ESG披露报告制度未能充分满足股东和其他投资者的需求。虽然一些评论者认为这个问题可以通过委员会加强指导和执法来解决,但大多数人并不这样认为。相反,我们需要改变信息披露制度;(2)除了确保重大信息(无论如何定义)的披露外,SEC要求的设计应促进ESG披露的一致性、可靠性和可比性;(3)各方一致认为,需要建立一个更健全的公司可持续性披露制度,这种分析应考虑到比通常情况下更长期的可持续性,解决相关的ESG问题,并包括对减少或纠正可持续性威胁的努力的定性分析。该信函分析了重要性的定义,得出结论认为,该术语不仅限于将在短期内对收益或经营产生重大影响的事项。该信进一步指出,披露制度也是围绕可比性的需要建立的,这种方法并不依赖于显示信息重要性的需要。为了解决支持增加ESG披露的评论者的共识领域,委员会应就现有披露义务对ESG事项的适用性提供额外的指导,采用一种规定制度,要求披露对广大投资者群体重要的、对所有或大多数上市公司共同的特定ESG事项。并在法规S-K中增加一个额外的项目,主要通过基于原则的披露制度来具体解决可持续性问题。