Hans Jonas i Alan Watts: teodycea a mit spekulatywny

Łukasz Mazur
{"title":"Hans Jonas i Alan Watts: teodycea a mit spekulatywny","authors":"Łukasz Mazur","doi":"10.15633/r.2444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is a brief comparative work, whose subject are two different spec­ulative myths. The first is the myth of English theologian Alan Watts; the second – the Jewish philosopher Hans Jonas. Both myths refer to the issues of theodicy. This article attempts to present the main thesis of both myths. Furthermore, it shows the specific role of a myth in the context of issues of theodicy.","PeriodicalId":308936,"journal":{"name":"Racjonalia. Z punktu widzenia humanistyki","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Racjonalia. Z punktu widzenia humanistyki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/r.2444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is a brief comparative work, whose subject are two different spec­ulative myths. The first is the myth of English theologian Alan Watts; the second – the Jewish philosopher Hans Jonas. Both myths refer to the issues of theodicy. This article attempts to present the main thesis of both myths. Furthermore, it shows the specific role of a myth in the context of issues of theodicy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文是一个简短的比较工作,其主题是两种不同的投机神话。第一个是英国神学家艾伦·沃茨的神话;第二个是犹太哲学家汉斯·乔纳斯。这两个神话都涉及到神正论的问题。本文试图呈现这两个神话的主要论点。此外,它还显示了神话在神正论问题背景下的特殊作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Konferencja: Wszyscy jesteśmy filozofami. Kraków, 13–14 grudnia 2017 Teodycea a logika modalna. Bogusława Wolniewicza polemika z krytyką teodycei u Pierre’a Bayle’a „Religia Natury”. O relacji człowiek–przyroda Świat poza boską kontrolą. Jedna z odpowiedzi na problem zła naturalnego Krytyka i propozycje rozszerzenia ontycznych podstaw odpowiedzialności Romana Ingardena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1