Reducing Unnecessary Conservativeness in Access Rights Analysis with String Analysis

Mika Koganeyama, Naoshi Tabuchi, T. Tateishi
{"title":"Reducing Unnecessary Conservativeness in Access Rights Analysis with String Analysis","authors":"Mika Koganeyama, Naoshi Tabuchi, T. Tateishi","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2007.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The JavaTM2 runtime system has a security mechanism which guarantees the code under execution has appropriate access permissions to a certain system resource. Use of this security mechanism requires access control policies to specify what operations are permitted on each such resource at each program point. Previous work proposed a program analysis algorithm to statically infer a semi-optimal policy set from given program text. However the proposed method cannot calculate the optimal policy when the target resource is determined by string values at run-time, since it does not keep track of all potential string values generated through built-in or user-defined methods. This results in generating excessive access policies where actually unnecessary resource accesses are permitted. To overcome such limitations, we apply static string analysis to program variables relevant to access control policies. This paper shows that unnecessary permissions can be reduced with string analysis by applying it to analyzing open-source libraries.","PeriodicalId":273688,"journal":{"name":"14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2007.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The JavaTM2 runtime system has a security mechanism which guarantees the code under execution has appropriate access permissions to a certain system resource. Use of this security mechanism requires access control policies to specify what operations are permitted on each such resource at each program point. Previous work proposed a program analysis algorithm to statically infer a semi-optimal policy set from given program text. However the proposed method cannot calculate the optimal policy when the target resource is determined by string values at run-time, since it does not keep track of all potential string values generated through built-in or user-defined methods. This results in generating excessive access policies where actually unnecessary resource accesses are permitted. To overcome such limitations, we apply static string analysis to program variables relevant to access control policies. This paper shows that unnecessary permissions can be reduced with string analysis by applying it to analyzing open-source libraries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用字符串分析减少访问权限分析中不必要的保守性
JavaTM2运行时系统具有一种安全机制,它保证正在执行的代码具有对特定系统资源的适当访问权限。使用这种安全机制需要访问控制策略来指定在每个程序点允许对每个此类资源进行哪些操作。先前的工作提出了一种从给定的程序文本中静态推断半最优策略集的程序分析算法。然而,当目标资源在运行时由字符串值确定时,所提出的方法无法计算最佳策略,因为它没有跟踪通过内置方法或用户定义方法生成的所有潜在字符串值。这将导致生成过多的访问策略,其中实际上允许不必要的资源访问。为了克服这些限制,我们将静态字符串分析应用于与访问控制策略相关的程序变量。通过将字符串分析应用于开源库的分析,可以减少不必要的权限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MEtaGile: An Agile Domain-Specific Modeling Environment Use of Agile Methods and Practices in the Philippines A Process Pattern Language for Agile Methods A Survey on the Business Relationship between Chinese Outsourcing Software Suppliers and Their Outsourcers Improving Data Integrity with a Java Mutability Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1