The Intravenous Diazepam Interview for Motor Paralysis Cases Influenced by Psychiatric Disorder

A. Nishizawa, Kiyoshi Ito, Tomoki Nakano
{"title":"The Intravenous Diazepam Interview for Motor Paralysis Cases Influenced by Psychiatric Disorder","authors":"A. Nishizawa, Kiyoshi Ito, Tomoki Nakano","doi":"10.14789/JMJ.2019.65.JMJ18-CR04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Motor rehabilitation may be rarely disrupted by psychiatric disorders including conversion disorder and catatonia. The amobarbital or diazepam interview can be implemented for both the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. We report two typical cases presenting with motor paralysis influenced by psychiatric disorder that were effectively diagnosed and treated using the diazepam interview in convalescent rehabilitation. Cases: Case 1 was a 32-year-old man. He experienced severe paralysis and sensory disturbance of the right arm and leg while at work, and then received conservative treatment for stroke. One month later, after the diazepam interview, he rapidly recovered almost entirely from his paralysis and sensory disturbance, which led to a diagnosis of conversion disorder. Case 2 was a 42-yearold man. After becoming an alcoholic, both legs had gradually become severely paralyzed. Two months later, he was uncommunicative and refused rehabilitation and nursing care. He briefly became communicative during the diazepam interview, and was diagnosed with delusional depressed state with stupor. Six months later, both legs remained spastic and paralyzed. Although he was subacute with combined degeneration of the spinal cord, taking conversion disorder overlap into consideration, we conducted the diazepam interview again; he immediately recovered slight voluntary extension and flexion of both legs. Conclusions: We describe two motor disturbance cases influenced by psychiatric disorders. For both patients, the diazepam interview was shown to be an effective method for the diagnosis and treatment of a psychiatric disorder. Our findings suggest that the diazepam interview could be appropriate for use in the rehabilitation area when conducted correctly.","PeriodicalId":223994,"journal":{"name":"Juntendo Medical Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juntendo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14789/JMJ.2019.65.JMJ18-CR04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Motor rehabilitation may be rarely disrupted by psychiatric disorders including conversion disorder and catatonia. The amobarbital or diazepam interview can be implemented for both the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. We report two typical cases presenting with motor paralysis influenced by psychiatric disorder that were effectively diagnosed and treated using the diazepam interview in convalescent rehabilitation. Cases: Case 1 was a 32-year-old man. He experienced severe paralysis and sensory disturbance of the right arm and leg while at work, and then received conservative treatment for stroke. One month later, after the diazepam interview, he rapidly recovered almost entirely from his paralysis and sensory disturbance, which led to a diagnosis of conversion disorder. Case 2 was a 42-yearold man. After becoming an alcoholic, both legs had gradually become severely paralyzed. Two months later, he was uncommunicative and refused rehabilitation and nursing care. He briefly became communicative during the diazepam interview, and was diagnosed with delusional depressed state with stupor. Six months later, both legs remained spastic and paralyzed. Although he was subacute with combined degeneration of the spinal cord, taking conversion disorder overlap into consideration, we conducted the diazepam interview again; he immediately recovered slight voluntary extension and flexion of both legs. Conclusions: We describe two motor disturbance cases influenced by psychiatric disorders. For both patients, the diazepam interview was shown to be an effective method for the diagnosis and treatment of a psychiatric disorder. Our findings suggest that the diazepam interview could be appropriate for use in the rehabilitation area when conducted correctly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神障碍所致运动麻痹患者静脉注射安定的疗效观察
背景:运动康复很少会因精神障碍而中断,包括转换障碍和紧张症。阿莫巴比妥或地西泮访谈可用于这些疾病的诊断和治疗。我们报告了两例典型的精神障碍影响下的运动麻痹,在康复康复中使用地西泮访谈有效地诊断和治疗。病例1:病例1为32岁男性。他在工作时经历了严重的麻痹和右臂和腿的感觉障碍,然后接受了中风的保守治疗。一个月后,在接受安定治疗后,他几乎完全从瘫痪和感觉障碍中恢复过来,这导致他被诊断为转化障碍。病例2是一名42岁的男性。酗酒之后,双腿逐渐严重瘫痪。两个月后,他变得沉默寡言,拒绝接受康复治疗和护理。他在接受安定治疗期间短暂地变得健谈,并被诊断为妄想性抑郁状态伴昏迷。六个月后,双腿仍然痉挛和瘫痪。虽然他是亚急性合并脊髓退行性变,但考虑到转换障碍重叠,我们再次进行了安定访谈;他立即恢复了双腿的轻微自主伸展和屈曲。结论:我们描述了两例由精神障碍影响的运动障碍病例。对于这两个病人,地西泮访谈被证明是诊断和治疗精神障碍的有效方法。我们的研究结果表明,当进行正确时,地西泮访谈可以适用于康复领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Alzheimer-type Dementia Presenting with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Retrospective Chart Review of 102 Patients Available for 12-month Follow-up after Initiation of Treatment Mechanism of Post-stroke Axonal Outgrowth and Functional Recovery Surgical Outcome after Sleeve Pneumonectomy for Thoracic Malignancy: A Comparison Between Salvage and Non-salvage Publications from Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2021 [3/6] My History in Juntendo University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1