Civilisation: A Critical and Constructive Review

S. Feuchtwang, M. Rowlands
{"title":"Civilisation: A Critical and Constructive Review","authors":"S. Feuchtwang, M. Rowlands","doi":"10.1017/9781108594875.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civilisation has for many decades been a rejected concept in anthropology and sociology because of its past evolutionary and Eurocentric misuses. Our reason for reintroducing it is that it will enable us to go beyond the narrow confines of time and space to which culture and society have been restricted and to raise our eyes to see the relations of societies and cultures to each other on a larger scale. In this chapter we will show how we can do this without the assumption of unilinear evolution and without Euro- or any other ethnocentrism.","PeriodicalId":416145,"journal":{"name":"Civilisation Recast","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civilisation Recast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108594875.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Civilisation has for many decades been a rejected concept in anthropology and sociology because of its past evolutionary and Eurocentric misuses. Our reason for reintroducing it is that it will enable us to go beyond the narrow confines of time and space to which culture and society have been restricted and to raise our eyes to see the relations of societies and cultures to each other on a larger scale. In this chapter we will show how we can do this without the assumption of unilinear evolution and without Euro- or any other ethnocentrism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文明:一个批判性和建设性的回顾
几十年来,文明在人类学和社会学中一直是一个被拒绝的概念,因为它过去被进化论和欧洲中心主义滥用。我们重新引入它的理由是,它将使我们能够超越文化和社会所受的时间和空间的狭隘限制,并提高我们的眼睛,在更大的范围内看到社会和文化之间的关系。在本章中,我们将展示如何在没有假设线性进化和没有欧洲或任何其他种族中心主义的情况下做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Neolithicities: From Africa to Eurasia and Beyond Index Civilisation and the Government of ‘Civilisation’ in Contemporary China Ancestors, Civilisation, and Hierarchy: Some Comparisons from Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1