Ball and Beam Control: Evaluating Type-1 and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Techniques with Root Locus Optimization

Rawiphon Chotikunnan, Phichitphon Chotikunnan, A. Ma’arif, N. Thongpance, Yutthana Pititheeraphab, A. Srisiriwat
{"title":"Ball and Beam Control: Evaluating Type-1 and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Techniques with Root Locus Optimization","authors":"Rawiphon Chotikunnan, Phichitphon Chotikunnan, A. Ma’arif, N. Thongpance, Yutthana Pititheeraphab, A. Srisiriwat","doi":"10.31763/ijrcs.v3i2.997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the performance of three control systems, namely the root locus method, type-1 Mamdani fuzzy logic system (FLS), and interval type-2 Mamdani FLS, in noise-free and noisy ball and beam systems. The main contribution of this study is enabling improved design and implementation of control systems in real-world applications by offering a comprehensive understanding of each control system's performance. The methodology involves conducting four tests focusing on various input types, including a 0.8-meter step input and sine wave function, and assessing the presence of noise in the system. The performance of each control system is analyzed using parameters such as rise time, setting time, and percentage overshoot, with the interval type-2 Mamdani FLS further examined by varying footprint of uncertainty values. Results from noise-free tests reveal that the root locus method has shorter rise and setting times, but a higher percentage overshoot compared to the type-1 Mamdani FLS and type-2 Mamdani FLS. In noisy environments, the type-2 Mamdani FLS with varying Footprint of Uncertainty values outperforms the type-1 Mamdani FLS with reduced rise time, setting time, and percentage overshoot. The root locus method shows a significantly higher percentage overshoot in noisy conditions compared to the other two control systems. In conclusion, the type-2 Mamdani FLS control system demonstrates superior capability under changing conditions compared to the type-1 Mamdani FLS, with its performance varying based on footprint of uncertainty values. This study highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate control system depending on specific needs and environmental factors.","PeriodicalId":409364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v3i2.997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of three control systems, namely the root locus method, type-1 Mamdani fuzzy logic system (FLS), and interval type-2 Mamdani FLS, in noise-free and noisy ball and beam systems. The main contribution of this study is enabling improved design and implementation of control systems in real-world applications by offering a comprehensive understanding of each control system's performance. The methodology involves conducting four tests focusing on various input types, including a 0.8-meter step input and sine wave function, and assessing the presence of noise in the system. The performance of each control system is analyzed using parameters such as rise time, setting time, and percentage overshoot, with the interval type-2 Mamdani FLS further examined by varying footprint of uncertainty values. Results from noise-free tests reveal that the root locus method has shorter rise and setting times, but a higher percentage overshoot compared to the type-1 Mamdani FLS and type-2 Mamdani FLS. In noisy environments, the type-2 Mamdani FLS with varying Footprint of Uncertainty values outperforms the type-1 Mamdani FLS with reduced rise time, setting time, and percentage overshoot. The root locus method shows a significantly higher percentage overshoot in noisy conditions compared to the other two control systems. In conclusion, the type-2 Mamdani FLS control system demonstrates superior capability under changing conditions compared to the type-1 Mamdani FLS, with its performance varying based on footprint of uncertainty values. This study highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate control system depending on specific needs and environmental factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
球梁控制:用根轨迹优化评价1型和区间2型模糊技术
本文研究了根轨迹法、1型Mamdani模糊逻辑系统(FLS)和区间型Mamdani模糊逻辑系统(FLS)三种控制系统在无噪声和有噪声球梁系统中的性能。本研究的主要贡献是通过全面了解每个控制系统的性能,使控制系统的设计和实现在实际应用中得到改进。该方法包括针对不同输入类型(包括0.8米阶跃输入和正弦波函数)进行四次测试,并评估系统中存在的噪声。使用上升时间、整定时间和超调百分比等参数对每个控制系统的性能进行了分析,并通过改变不确定性值的足迹进一步检查了区间2型Mamdani FLS。无噪声试验结果表明,根轨迹法与1型和2型Mamdani FLS相比,具有较短的上升和沉降时间,但有较高的超调率。在噪声环境中,具有不同不确定性足迹值的2型Mamdani FLS优于1型Mamdani FLS,其上升时间、设置时间和超调百分比均有所减少。与其他两种控制系统相比,根轨迹法在噪声条件下显示出显着更高的超调百分比。综上所述,2型Mamdani FLS控制系统在变化条件下的性能优于1型Mamdani FLS,其性能随不确定性值的占用而变化。这项研究强调了根据具体需要和环境因素选择适当控制系统的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance Enhancement of a Variable Speed Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Used for Renewable Energy Application Comparison of Feature Extraction with PCA and LTP Methods and Investigating the Effect of Dimensionality Reduction in the Bat Algorithm for Face Recognition Power Quality Improvement using a New DPC Switching Table for a Three-Phase SAPF Integrated Modelling and Control of Linear Actuator Based Automatic Pedal Pressing Mechanism for Low-Speed Driving in a Road Traffic Delay Fish Swarmed Kalman Filter for State Observer Feedback of Two-Wheeled Mobile Robot Stabilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1