Creativity in Open Innovation Contests: How Seeing Others’ Ideas Can Harm Or Help Your Creative Performance

R. Hofstetter, D. Dahl, Suleiman Aryobsei, A. Herrmann
{"title":"Creativity in Open Innovation Contests: How Seeing Others’ Ideas Can Harm Or Help Your Creative Performance","authors":"R. Hofstetter, D. Dahl, Suleiman Aryobsei, A. Herrmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2948910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public open innovation contests are becoming an increasingly popular way for firms to generate new ideas. In this article, we investigate how seeing others’ prior ideas influences the creative performance of individuals and how firms can improve idea presentation in contests to get more and better ideas. Based on five experimental studies, we first show that seeing numerous competitive prior ideas will harm creative performance. Exposure to an increasing number of prior ideas competitively presented reduces an individual’s feelings of competence and resulting ability to generate original ideas. Based on these results, we investigate alternative ways to present prior ideas in open innovation contests including categorizing or restricting the display of prior ideas. Presenting prior ideas in categories facilitates their processing and reduces individuals’ difficulty to distinguish their own ideas from the prior ones, increasing felt competence. We optimize the user interface of an open innovation contest platform based on these results and find that both a restricted and categorized interface significantly increase the number and originality of ideas suggested. These results offer viable ways to improve realized innovation outcomes merely by changing how prior ideas are presented in contests.","PeriodicalId":268180,"journal":{"name":"ACR North American Advances","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR North American Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2948910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Public open innovation contests are becoming an increasingly popular way for firms to generate new ideas. In this article, we investigate how seeing others’ prior ideas influences the creative performance of individuals and how firms can improve idea presentation in contests to get more and better ideas. Based on five experimental studies, we first show that seeing numerous competitive prior ideas will harm creative performance. Exposure to an increasing number of prior ideas competitively presented reduces an individual’s feelings of competence and resulting ability to generate original ideas. Based on these results, we investigate alternative ways to present prior ideas in open innovation contests including categorizing or restricting the display of prior ideas. Presenting prior ideas in categories facilitates their processing and reduces individuals’ difficulty to distinguish their own ideas from the prior ones, increasing felt competence. We optimize the user interface of an open innovation contest platform based on these results and find that both a restricted and categorized interface significantly increase the number and originality of ideas suggested. These results offer viable ways to improve realized innovation outcomes merely by changing how prior ideas are presented in contests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式创新竞赛中的创造力:如何看待他人的想法会损害或帮助你的创造性表现
公开的创新竞赛正成为企业产生新想法的一种日益流行的方式。在这篇文章中,我们研究了看到别人的先前想法如何影响个人的创造性表现,以及公司如何在比赛中改进想法表达以获得更多更好的想法。基于五项实验研究,我们首先表明,看到大量竞争性的先前想法会损害创造性表现。暴露在越来越多的竞争性想法面前,会降低个人的能力感,从而降低产生原创想法的能力。基于这些结果,我们研究了在开放式创新竞赛中展示现有想法的替代方法,包括分类或限制现有想法的展示。分类呈现先验概念有助于加工,降低个体区分自己和先验概念的难度,提高感知能力。基于这些结果,我们对开放式创新竞赛平台的用户界面进行了优化,发现限制界面和分类界面都显著增加了建议的数量和独创性。这些结果提供了可行的方法来提高实现的创新成果,仅仅通过改变先前的想法在竞赛中的呈现方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial behavior among young adult consumers: the influence of self-determination and financial psychology Warm or Cold? The Effect of Color Temperature of Logo on Evaluation of For-Profits and Nonprofits When Sharing Isn’t Caring: The Influence of Seeking The Best on Sharing Favorable Word of Mouth about Unsatisfactory Purchases Birds of a Feather Feel Together: Emotional Ability Similarity in Consumer Interactions Goal Conflict Encourages Work and Discourages Leisure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1