Ergonomic work posture in undergraduate dentistry students: Correlation between theory and practice

Patricia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia, Ana de Araujo Gottardello, C. Presoto, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
{"title":"Ergonomic work posture in undergraduate dentistry students: Correlation between theory and practice","authors":"Patricia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia, Ana de Araujo Gottardello, C. Presoto, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos","doi":"10.4103/0974-7761.188568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The presence of theoretical knowledge on ergonomics, as well as its practical application, is very important to prevent musculoskeletal disorders. Aims: Correlating between the theoretical knowledge of ergonomic posture and its practical application among dentistry students, as well as between the students′ theoretical knowledge and their practical self-assessment. Settings and Design: Sixty second-year graduate students of Araraquara Dental School, UNESP were evaluated. Subjects and Methods: Each student responded to a multiple-choice questionnaire on the requirements of ergonomic posture and received a score (0-10 points). To analyze the practical implementation of work posture and the self-assessment, photographs were taken of students performing laboratory procedures. To assess the practical application, each procedure was assessed by a calibrated researcher (ρ =0.78) and received a score (0-10 points). For the self-assessment, each student analyzed the photographs of their own posture and received a score (0-10 points). The theoretical knowledge and the self-assessment practice were corrected by the researcher. Statistical Analysis: A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. The correlation between theoretical knowledge and practical application and between theoretical knowledge and self-assessment were estimated using Pearson′s correlation coefficient (r), and the significance was tested using Student′s t-test. The level of significance was set at 5%. Results: There was no correlation between theoretical knowledge and practical application (r = 0.100, P = 0.450) nor between theoretical knowledge and the practical self-assessment score (r = 0.067, P = 0.623). Conclusions: The theoretical knowledge of students on ergonomics was greater than its practical application and their self-assessment, and there was no correlation between them.","PeriodicalId":348927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Ethics in Dentistry","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Ethics in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7761.188568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Context: The presence of theoretical knowledge on ergonomics, as well as its practical application, is very important to prevent musculoskeletal disorders. Aims: Correlating between the theoretical knowledge of ergonomic posture and its practical application among dentistry students, as well as between the students′ theoretical knowledge and their practical self-assessment. Settings and Design: Sixty second-year graduate students of Araraquara Dental School, UNESP were evaluated. Subjects and Methods: Each student responded to a multiple-choice questionnaire on the requirements of ergonomic posture and received a score (0-10 points). To analyze the practical implementation of work posture and the self-assessment, photographs were taken of students performing laboratory procedures. To assess the practical application, each procedure was assessed by a calibrated researcher (ρ =0.78) and received a score (0-10 points). For the self-assessment, each student analyzed the photographs of their own posture and received a score (0-10 points). The theoretical knowledge and the self-assessment practice were corrected by the researcher. Statistical Analysis: A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. The correlation between theoretical knowledge and practical application and between theoretical knowledge and self-assessment were estimated using Pearson′s correlation coefficient (r), and the significance was tested using Student′s t-test. The level of significance was set at 5%. Results: There was no correlation between theoretical knowledge and practical application (r = 0.100, P = 0.450) nor between theoretical knowledge and the practical self-assessment score (r = 0.067, P = 0.623). Conclusions: The theoretical knowledge of students on ergonomics was greater than its practical application and their self-assessment, and there was no correlation between them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔本科学生的人体工学工作姿势:理论与实践的关系
背景:人体工程学的理论知识及其实际应用对于预防肌肉骨骼疾病非常重要。目的:探讨口腔学生人体工学姿势理论知识与实际应用的关系,以及学生理论知识与实际自我评价的关系。环境与设计:对UNESP Araraquara牙科学院60名二年级研究生进行评估。受试者与方法:每位学生填写一份关于人体工学姿势要求的选择题问卷,并打分(0-10分)。为了分析工作姿势的实际实施和自我评估,拍摄了学生进行实验室程序的照片。为了评估实际应用,每个程序由校准的研究人员评估(ρ =0.78)并获得评分(0-10分)。在自我评估中,每个学生分析了自己的姿势照片,并给出了一个分数(0-10分)。研究者对理论知识和自我评价实践进行了修正。统计分析:进行描述性统计分析。理论知识与实际应用、理论知识与自我评价的相关性采用Pearson相关系数(r)估计,显著性采用Student’st检验。显著性水平设为5%。结果:理论知识与实际应用无相关性(r = 0.100, P = 0.450),理论知识与实际自评得分无相关性(r = 0.067, P = 0.623)。结论:学生对工效学的理论知识量大于实际应用量和自我评价量,两者之间不存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcome evaluation of faculty development program for dental educators: A questionnaire survey Medical skills training for undergraduate dental students An ethical awareness among dental interns in dental practice Ethical issues in dentist–patient interactions A comparative study for the evaluation of self-medication practices among dental students in a tertiary care dental teaching institute in Delhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1