Clinical Impact of Radiologist Interpretation of CT in PET-CT Imaging

F. Qing, M. Graham, T. Abraham, J. Sohi, E. J. R. Van Beek
{"title":"Clinical Impact of Radiologist Interpretation of CT in PET-CT Imaging","authors":"F. Qing,&nbsp;M. Graham,&nbsp;T. Abraham,&nbsp;J. Sohi,&nbsp;E. J. R. Van Beek","doi":"10.1111/j.1617-0830.2009.00134.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We assessed whether radiologists’ reading of the CT portion of the PET-CT identifies significant additional lesions and whether these findings result in major clinical management changes.</p>\n <p>716 consecutive patients (pts) aged 13–87 underwent FDG PET-CT scans for known or suspected cancer between 07/05–03/06. Only those pts without a diagnostic CT within 1 month prior to the PET-CT were included. The CT portion of the PET-CT was read by a nuclear medicine or radiology resident or fellow with 1 of 3 designated radiologists and dictated separately from the PET report, which was read with 1 of 5 nuclear medicine faculty physicians. Typically the PET portion was read on the day of scan and CT portion next morning. The radiologists were aware of the PET results and had access to fused PET-CT images. The PET-CT system used was a 2-slice Siemens Biograph. Particular attention was paid to 5 major findings, which are not FDG avid: small pulmonary nodules, lymph nodes, pneumothorax, aortic aneurysm, and renal cell carcinoma. Other CT findings were listed as minor.</p>\n <p>The major findings identified by radiologists, but not mentioned by nuclear medicine faculty, were FDG-negative lung nodules (typically sub-cm) in 91 pts (12.8%), 43 FDG-negative lymph node/soft tissue masses (6.0%), 1 pneumothorax, 1 pneumoperitoneum, 15 aortic aneurysms (1.9%) and no renal cell carcinoma. This resulted in 21% of all patients having findings. However, major clinical management changes as a result of these findings only occurred in 3 pts: one with a 7-cm AAA who underwent endograft repair and another patient with enlarged right iliac lymph nodes that were subsequently excised. The pt with pneumothorax did not require chest drain. The pt with pneumoperitoneum underwent laparotomy for perforation of duodenal ulcer. The remaining 7 aneurysms are being followed, as are the cases of small pulmonary nodules. Among the minor radiology findings were: calcified granulomas 122 (17%), atherosclerotic calcifications 77 (10.8%), kidney/liver cysts 35 (4.9%), emphysema 39 (5.4%), gallstones 21 (2.9%), and pericardial effusion 19 (2.7%). None of these led to major clinical management changes.</p>\n <p>The reading of the CT portion of a PET-CT study often identifies FDG-negative lesions; however, it infrequently leads to major clinical management changes in oncology patients. Nevertheless, given the severity of some of these findings, it seems warranted that that the CT portion of the examination be carefully examined by a physician with appropriate CT experience.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89151,"journal":{"name":"Imaging decisions (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"12 4","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1617-0830.2009.00134.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging decisions (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1617-0830.2009.00134.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assessed whether radiologists’ reading of the CT portion of the PET-CT identifies significant additional lesions and whether these findings result in major clinical management changes.

716 consecutive patients (pts) aged 13–87 underwent FDG PET-CT scans for known or suspected cancer between 07/05–03/06. Only those pts without a diagnostic CT within 1 month prior to the PET-CT were included. The CT portion of the PET-CT was read by a nuclear medicine or radiology resident or fellow with 1 of 3 designated radiologists and dictated separately from the PET report, which was read with 1 of 5 nuclear medicine faculty physicians. Typically the PET portion was read on the day of scan and CT portion next morning. The radiologists were aware of the PET results and had access to fused PET-CT images. The PET-CT system used was a 2-slice Siemens Biograph. Particular attention was paid to 5 major findings, which are not FDG avid: small pulmonary nodules, lymph nodes, pneumothorax, aortic aneurysm, and renal cell carcinoma. Other CT findings were listed as minor.

The major findings identified by radiologists, but not mentioned by nuclear medicine faculty, were FDG-negative lung nodules (typically sub-cm) in 91 pts (12.8%), 43 FDG-negative lymph node/soft tissue masses (6.0%), 1 pneumothorax, 1 pneumoperitoneum, 15 aortic aneurysms (1.9%) and no renal cell carcinoma. This resulted in 21% of all patients having findings. However, major clinical management changes as a result of these findings only occurred in 3 pts: one with a 7-cm AAA who underwent endograft repair and another patient with enlarged right iliac lymph nodes that were subsequently excised. The pt with pneumothorax did not require chest drain. The pt with pneumoperitoneum underwent laparotomy for perforation of duodenal ulcer. The remaining 7 aneurysms are being followed, as are the cases of small pulmonary nodules. Among the minor radiology findings were: calcified granulomas 122 (17%), atherosclerotic calcifications 77 (10.8%), kidney/liver cysts 35 (4.9%), emphysema 39 (5.4%), gallstones 21 (2.9%), and pericardial effusion 19 (2.7%). None of these led to major clinical management changes.

The reading of the CT portion of a PET-CT study often identifies FDG-negative lesions; however, it infrequently leads to major clinical management changes in oncology patients. Nevertheless, given the severity of some of these findings, it seems warranted that that the CT portion of the examination be carefully examined by a physician with appropriate CT experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射科医师在PET-CT成像中CT解读的临床影响
我们评估了放射科医生对PET-CT的CT部分的解读是否能识别出显著的附加病变,以及这些发现是否会导致重大的临床管理改变。716名年龄在13-87岁的连续患者在07/05 - 06 / 03期间接受了FDG PET-CT扫描,以检查已知或疑似癌症。仅包括那些在PET-CT前1个月内未进行诊断性CT检查的患者。PET-CT的CT部分由核医学或放射科住院医师或3名指定放射科医师中的1名阅读并与PET报告分开,PET报告由5名核医学院系医师中的1名阅读。通常在扫描当天读取PET部分,第二天早上读取CT部分。放射科医生知道PET的结果,并有机会获得PET- ct的融合图像。使用的PET-CT系统为2层Siemens Biograph。特别注意5个主要的发现,这不是FDG的要求:小肺结节、淋巴结、气胸、主动脉瘤和肾细胞癌。其他CT表现均为轻微。放射科医师发现但核医学人员未提及的主要发现是:91例(12.8%)患者中fdg阴性肺结节(通常小于厘米),43例(6.0%)患者中fdg阴性淋巴结/软组织肿块,1例气胸,1例气腹,15例主动脉瘤(1.9%),无肾细胞癌。这导致21%的患者出现了症状。然而,由于这些发现,主要的临床管理改变只发生在3名患者身上:一名7厘米AAA患者接受了内移植物修复,另一名右髂淋巴结肿大的患者随后被切除。气胸患者不需要胸腔引流。气腹患者因十二指肠溃疡穿孔行开腹手术。其余的7个动脉瘤和小肺结节正在接受随访。次要影像学表现为:钙化肉芽肿122例(17%),动脉粥样硬化钙化77例(10.8%),肾/肝囊肿35例(4.9%),肺气肿39例(5.4%),胆结石21例(2.9%),心包积液19例(2.7%)。这些都没有导致重大的临床管理变化。PET-CT检查的CT部分通常识别fdg阴性病变;然而,它很少导致肿瘤患者的临床管理发生重大变化。然而,考虑到这些发现的严重性,似乎有必要由具有适当CT经验的医生仔细检查CT检查部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Problem-Solving Modality? Spectroscopic Imaging of Breast Cancer Breast MR-Imaging of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Systematic Review Understanding and Application of Different Breast Imaging Studies Breast Imaging, Overview and New Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1