A Portrait of Firms that Invest in R&D

L. Foster, Cheryl Grim, Nikolas J. Zolas
{"title":"A Portrait of Firms that Invest in R&D","authors":"L. Foster, Cheryl Grim, Nikolas J. Zolas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2845982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We focus on the evolution and behavior of firms that invest in research and development (R&D). We build upon the cross-sectional analysis in Foster and Grim (2010) that identified the characteristics of top R&D spending firms and follow up by charting the behavior of these firms over time. Our focus is dynamic in nature as we merge micro-level cross-sectional data from the Survey of Industrial Research and Development (SIRD) and the Business Research & Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) with the Longitudinal Business Database (LBD). The result is a panel firm-level data set from 1992 to 2011 that tracks firms’ performances as they enter and exit the R&D surveys. Using R&D expenditures to proxy R&D performance, we find the top R&D performing firms in the U.S. across all years to be large, old, multinational enterprises. However, we also find that the composition of R&D performing firms is gradually shifting more towards smaller domestic firms with expenditures being less sensitive to scale effects. We find a high degree of persistence for these firms over time. We chart the history of R&D performing firms and compare them to all firms in the economy and find substantial differences in terms of age, size, firm structure and international activity; these differences persist when looking at future firm outcomes.","PeriodicalId":320323,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2845982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We focus on the evolution and behavior of firms that invest in research and development (R&D). We build upon the cross-sectional analysis in Foster and Grim (2010) that identified the characteristics of top R&D spending firms and follow up by charting the behavior of these firms over time. Our focus is dynamic in nature as we merge micro-level cross-sectional data from the Survey of Industrial Research and Development (SIRD) and the Business Research & Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) with the Longitudinal Business Database (LBD). The result is a panel firm-level data set from 1992 to 2011 that tracks firms’ performances as they enter and exit the R&D surveys. Using R&D expenditures to proxy R&D performance, we find the top R&D performing firms in the U.S. across all years to be large, old, multinational enterprises. However, we also find that the composition of R&D performing firms is gradually shifting more towards smaller domestic firms with expenditures being less sensitive to scale effects. We find a high degree of persistence for these firms over time. We chart the history of R&D performing firms and compare them to all firms in the economy and find substantial differences in terms of age, size, firm structure and international activity; these differences persist when looking at future firm outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资研发的公司概况
我们关注的是投资于研发(R&D)的企业的演变和行为。我们在福斯特和格里姆(2010)的横断面分析的基础上,确定了顶级研发支出公司的特征,并通过绘制这些公司随时间的行为图表来跟进。我们的重点是动态的,因为我们将来自工业研究与发展调查(SIRD)和商业研究与发展与创新调查(BRDIS)的微观层面的横截面数据与纵向商业数据库(LBD)相结合。其结果是一个从1992年到2011年的公司层面的面板数据集,跟踪了公司在参与和退出研发调查时的表现。使用研发支出来代表研发绩效,我们发现美国研发绩效最高的公司在所有年份都是大型、老牌的跨国企业。然而,我们也发现,研发绩效企业的构成正逐渐向规模较小的国内企业转移,这些企业的支出对规模效应不太敏感。我们发现,随着时间的推移,这些公司具有高度的持久性。我们绘制了研发绩效公司的历史图表,并将它们与经济中的所有公司进行比较,发现在年龄、规模、公司结构和国际活动方面存在实质性差异;在展望公司未来的业绩时,这些差异依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms Three Decades of Research on Corporate Governance and R&D Investments: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda The Risk of Caution: Evidence from an R&D Experiment Bilateral R&D Productivity and Supply Chain Networks Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1