Title VII and Caste Discrimination

G. Krishnamurthi, C. Krishnaswami
{"title":"Title VII and Caste Discrimination","authors":"G. Krishnamurthi, C. Krishnaswami","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3725938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caste oppression is real and present in our midst in the United States. In the Summer of 2020, several employees of large tech firms like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Cisco came forward with harrowing tales of workplace discrimination, including being paid less, denied promotions, and being mocked for their caste background. And, undoubtedly, the scourge of caste discrimination extends beyond Big Tech. While caste discrimination is in no sense new, these recent reports should serve as a needed wake-up call. Eradicating caste discrimination demands our immediate collective attention and action. \n \nAs just one step in the complex and continuing fight to eradicate caste oppression, this Article contends that caste discrimination is cognizable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In particular, we argue that in light of our understanding of the caste system and the Supreme Court’s teaching in Bostock v. Clayton County, caste discrimination is a type of racial discrimination, religious discrimination, and national origin discrimination — all covered under Title VII. Recognizing caste discrimination as such provides potent tools to the relevant stakeholders to combat caste oppression. But more importantly, it also confers duties upon employers and government institutions to be vigilant in ensuring that employees are safeguarded from caste discrimination.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Caste oppression is real and present in our midst in the United States. In the Summer of 2020, several employees of large tech firms like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Cisco came forward with harrowing tales of workplace discrimination, including being paid less, denied promotions, and being mocked for their caste background. And, undoubtedly, the scourge of caste discrimination extends beyond Big Tech. While caste discrimination is in no sense new, these recent reports should serve as a needed wake-up call. Eradicating caste discrimination demands our immediate collective attention and action. As just one step in the complex and continuing fight to eradicate caste oppression, this Article contends that caste discrimination is cognizable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In particular, we argue that in light of our understanding of the caste system and the Supreme Court’s teaching in Bostock v. Clayton County, caste discrimination is a type of racial discrimination, religious discrimination, and national origin discrimination — all covered under Title VII. Recognizing caste discrimination as such provides potent tools to the relevant stakeholders to combat caste oppression. But more importantly, it also confers duties upon employers and government institutions to be vigilant in ensuring that employees are safeguarded from caste discrimination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第七章和种姓歧视
在美国,种姓压迫是真实存在的。2020年夏天,谷歌、苹果、微软和思科等大型科技公司的几名员工讲述了他们在工作场所受到歧视的悲惨故事,包括薪水更低、被拒绝升职、因种姓背景而被嘲笑。而且,毫无疑问,种姓歧视的祸害不仅限于大型科技公司。虽然种姓歧视并不是什么新鲜事物,但最近的这些报告应该为我们敲响必要的警钟。消除种姓歧视需要我们立即集体关注和行动。作为消除种姓压迫的复杂而持续的斗争中的一步,本文认为种姓歧视在1964年《民权法案》第七章中是可以被承认的。特别是,我们认为,根据我们对种姓制度的理解和最高法院在博斯托克诉克莱顿县案中的教学,种姓歧视是种族歧视、宗教歧视和国籍歧视的一种,这些都涵盖在第七章中。承认种姓歧视为相关利益相关者打击种姓压迫提供了有力的工具。但更重要的是,它还赋予雇主和政府机构保持警惕的责任,以确保雇员免受种姓歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work from/for Home: Recommendations to Ease Post-Pandemic Multiple Burden on Women Teleworking in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Enabling Conditions for a Successful Transition A Summary of the Statistical Aspects of the Procedures for Resolving Potential Employment Discrimination Recently Issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Along with a Commentary Creative Labour in the Era of Covid-19: The Case of Freelancers Non-Competes and Other Contracts of Dispossession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1