Classics in the Modernists' World

S. Nelson
{"title":"Classics in the Modernists' World","authors":"S. Nelson","doi":"10.1353/arn.2022.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the range of Gregory Baker’s new work on Celtic Modernism and Classics is impressive, even more impressive is the web of interconnections that it calls forth. On the one hand, Baker uncovers the fascinating variety in the nationalist and language-revival movements of Ireland, Wales, and Scotland in the 19th and 20th centuries. On the other, he reveals the profound differences possible in the role of “Classics” in the modern world. Far from the normative view of a gradual disappearance of Greek and Latin as irrelevant to modernity—an issue Baker interestingly, and ably, leaves to his conclusion—we see, for example, Scotland, where the study of academic English prevailed early over Classics, Wales, which viewed itself as Roman, and Ireland, seen now as an oral culture on the verge of finding its Homer. In each case, Classics, which had served as a key instrument of the English ruling class, connects with movements supporting the national language against the over-powering encroachment of English. Again, this occurs in a variety of ways: in Wales linked to anti-industrialism, in Scotland to the divide between Lowland Lallans and Highland Gaelic, and in Ireland to a mythologized past. Moreover, as Baker points out, Classics’ “decline” in fact opened it up for different kinds of repurposing, while work such as that of Cornford and Harrison “superannuated in a stroke the Victorian Homer,” as Eliot put it (100) by bringing ethnography, archaeology, and cultural anthropology into Classics, radically changing the implications of its reception. To add another intriguing touch, the four writers treated here, W. B. Yeats, James Joyce, David Jones, and Hugh Mac-","PeriodicalId":147483,"journal":{"name":"Arion: A Journal of the Humanities and the Classics","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arion: A Journal of the Humanities and the Classics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arn.2022.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the range of Gregory Baker’s new work on Celtic Modernism and Classics is impressive, even more impressive is the web of interconnections that it calls forth. On the one hand, Baker uncovers the fascinating variety in the nationalist and language-revival movements of Ireland, Wales, and Scotland in the 19th and 20th centuries. On the other, he reveals the profound differences possible in the role of “Classics” in the modern world. Far from the normative view of a gradual disappearance of Greek and Latin as irrelevant to modernity—an issue Baker interestingly, and ably, leaves to his conclusion—we see, for example, Scotland, where the study of academic English prevailed early over Classics, Wales, which viewed itself as Roman, and Ireland, seen now as an oral culture on the verge of finding its Homer. In each case, Classics, which had served as a key instrument of the English ruling class, connects with movements supporting the national language against the over-powering encroachment of English. Again, this occurs in a variety of ways: in Wales linked to anti-industrialism, in Scotland to the divide between Lowland Lallans and Highland Gaelic, and in Ireland to a mythologized past. Moreover, as Baker points out, Classics’ “decline” in fact opened it up for different kinds of repurposing, while work such as that of Cornford and Harrison “superannuated in a stroke the Victorian Homer,” as Eliot put it (100) by bringing ethnography, archaeology, and cultural anthropology into Classics, radically changing the implications of its reception. To add another intriguing touch, the four writers treated here, W. B. Yeats, James Joyce, David Jones, and Hugh Mac-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代主义世界中的经典
虽然格雷戈里·贝克关于凯尔特现代主义和经典的新作品的范围令人印象深刻,但更令人印象深刻的是它所唤起的相互联系的网络。一方面,贝克揭示了19世纪和20世纪爱尔兰、威尔士和苏格兰的民族主义和语言复兴运动中令人着迷的多样性。另一方面,他揭示了“经典”在现代世界中所扮演的角色可能存在的深刻差异。标准观点认为,希腊语和拉丁语的逐渐消失与现代性无关——贝克有趣而巧妙地把这个问题留到了结论中——我们看到,例如,苏格兰的学术英语研究早于古典文学盛行,威尔士认为自己是罗马人,爱尔兰现在被视为一种口头文化,即将找到自己的荷马。在每一种情况下,作为英国统治阶级重要工具的古典文学,都与支持本国语言、反对英语过度入侵的运动联系在一起。同样,这种情况以各种方式出现:在威尔士与反工业主义有关,在苏格兰与低地拉拉人和高地盖尔人之间的分歧有关,在爱尔兰则与神话般的过去有关。此外,正如贝克所指出的那样,古典文学的“衰落”实际上为不同的重新利用开辟了道路,而像康福德和哈里森这样的作品“一下子使维多利亚时代的荷马过时了”,正如艾略特所说(100),他们把民族志、考古学和文化人类学引入了古典文学,从根本上改变了接受古典文学的含义。为了增加另一个有趣的情调,这里讨论的四位作家,叶芝,詹姆斯·乔伊斯,大卫·琼斯和休·麦克
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
To Thaliarcus (Ode 1.9): Horace The Plan of Zeus and the Plight of the Octopus Four Epigrams After Petrarch – Sonnet 61 Epic Mess: Nonnus to Marino
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1