Gender and Generations Apart: labor tenants and customary law in segregation-era South Africa, 1920s to 1940s (review)

G. Geisler
{"title":"Gender and Generations Apart: labor tenants and customary law in segregation-era South Africa, 1920s to 1940s (review)","authors":"G. Geisler","doi":"10.1353/AFR.2007.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"problem, Walley argues, is that tourism developers are not only attracted to Mafia because of its ‘pristine’ environment, but also because labour is cheap. Wages in the tourism sector in developing countries can hardly ever replace income from other livelihood strategies. Interesting though this book is, a few critical remarks can be made. Each chapter starts with a theoretical introduction, and these sections disrupt the flow of the book somewhat; nor are they all up to date. Walley has a slight tendency to caricature her opponents in the debates she engages in. For instance, her rendition of globalization theories ignores the fact that many scholars before her have concluded that globalization is not new. The same applies to the presentation of the different views on the islands’ history and the concept of development. All earlier cautions about the need to acknowledge the heterogeneous character of ‘the state’ and international environmental/development organizations seem forgotten, and a coherent, simplistic view of development is ascribed to them. While the views of residents about tourism and the islands’ history are presented in quite personalized accounts, these are confronted with the views of anonymous, abstracted tourists. Not all ‘stakeholders’ are equally represented in the book. The voices we hear are mainly those of residents and the technical adviser. I can imagine that the Park Warden was less accessible, but Walley did have ample opportunities for discussions with the tourism developers, given that she was hosted by them. It would have been interesting to have some more detailed, less generalized, information about their views as well. Lastly, some of the comparisons of ‘Western’ and ‘local’ ideas of development are quite shallow – fewer versus more children, for example – though the contrast in religious ideas about the end of time is interesting. A lot has been written about anti-modernist discourses, not only in tourism, but also in conservation where there is a tendency to privilege ‘primitive’ indigenous peoples; references to this extensive literature are largely missing. Nevertheless, I recommend Walley’s book to anyone interested in community-based natural resource management, scholars and practitioners alike, as well as to anyone interested in the Swahili coast.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AFR.2007.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

problem, Walley argues, is that tourism developers are not only attracted to Mafia because of its ‘pristine’ environment, but also because labour is cheap. Wages in the tourism sector in developing countries can hardly ever replace income from other livelihood strategies. Interesting though this book is, a few critical remarks can be made. Each chapter starts with a theoretical introduction, and these sections disrupt the flow of the book somewhat; nor are they all up to date. Walley has a slight tendency to caricature her opponents in the debates she engages in. For instance, her rendition of globalization theories ignores the fact that many scholars before her have concluded that globalization is not new. The same applies to the presentation of the different views on the islands’ history and the concept of development. All earlier cautions about the need to acknowledge the heterogeneous character of ‘the state’ and international environmental/development organizations seem forgotten, and a coherent, simplistic view of development is ascribed to them. While the views of residents about tourism and the islands’ history are presented in quite personalized accounts, these are confronted with the views of anonymous, abstracted tourists. Not all ‘stakeholders’ are equally represented in the book. The voices we hear are mainly those of residents and the technical adviser. I can imagine that the Park Warden was less accessible, but Walley did have ample opportunities for discussions with the tourism developers, given that she was hosted by them. It would have been interesting to have some more detailed, less generalized, information about their views as well. Lastly, some of the comparisons of ‘Western’ and ‘local’ ideas of development are quite shallow – fewer versus more children, for example – though the contrast in religious ideas about the end of time is interesting. A lot has been written about anti-modernist discourses, not only in tourism, but also in conservation where there is a tendency to privilege ‘primitive’ indigenous peoples; references to this extensive literature are largely missing. Nevertheless, I recommend Walley’s book to anyone interested in community-based natural resource management, scholars and practitioners alike, as well as to anyone interested in the Swahili coast.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别与代际分离:20世纪20年代至40年代种族隔离时期南非的劳工佃户与习惯法(回顾)
Walley认为,问题在于旅游开发商被黑手党所吸引,不仅因为它的“原始”环境,还因为劳动力便宜。发展中国家旅游部门的工资几乎无法取代其他生计战略的收入。虽然这本书很有趣,但还是有一些批评的意见可以提出。每一章都以理论介绍开始,这些部分在某种程度上扰乱了本书的流程;它们也不是都是最新的。沃利在她参与的辩论中有轻微的讽刺对手的倾向。例如,她对全球化理论的阐释忽略了一个事实,即在她之前的许多学者已经得出结论,全球化并不新鲜。对这些岛屿的历史和发展概念提出不同的看法也是如此。所有早期关于需要承认“国家”和国际环境/发展组织的异质特征的警告似乎都被遗忘了,而一种连贯的、简单化的发展观被归咎于它们。虽然居民对旅游业和岛屿历史的看法是以相当个性化的方式呈现的,但他们面对的是匿名、抽象的游客的观点。并非所有的“利益相关者”在书中都有平等的代表。我们听到的声音主要是居民和技术顾问的声音。我可以想象,公园管理员不太容易接近,但沃利确实有很多机会与旅游开发商讨论,因为她是由他们接待的。如果能有一些更详细的、不那么笼统的关于他们观点的信息,那将会很有趣。最后,对“西方”和“当地”发展理念的一些比较相当肤浅——例如,少生孩子vs多生孩子——尽管关于时间终结的宗教观念的对比很有趣。关于反现代主义的论述已经写了很多,不仅在旅游业,而且在保护中,有一种倾向于特权“原始”土著人民;关于这一广泛文献的参考文献在很大程度上缺失了。尽管如此,我还是向所有对社区自然资源管理感兴趣的人、学者和实践者,以及对斯瓦希里海岸感兴趣的人推荐沃利的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sexual Humour in Africa: Gender, Jokes, and Societal Change ed. by Ignatius Chukwumah (review) India’s Development Diplomacy and Soft Power in Africa ed. by Kenneth King and Meera Venkatachalam (review) Understanding Zimbabwe: from liberation to authoritarianism by Sara Rich Dorman (review) The New Black Middle Class in South Africa by Roger Southall (review) The French Army and its African Soldiers: the years of decolonization by Ruth Ginio (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1