Validation of the Korean version of Feedback Environment Scale for Students(K-FESS)

Jae-uk Kim, Wonsook Sohn
{"title":"Validation of the Korean version of Feedback Environment Scale for\n Students(K-FESS)","authors":"Jae-uk Kim, Wonsook Sohn","doi":"10.29221/jce.2020.23.2.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he main p ur p ose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Feedback Environment Scale for Students(K-FESS). T he feedback environment is a contextual as p ect of the feedback p rocess and the feedback-oriented culture influences considerably the learner ' s acce p tance of feedback and whether they reflect this in their behavior. N evertheless, there are few research related to the effects of the feedback environment in the classroom assessment of Korea. T herefore, in this study, we utili z ed the Feedback Environment Scale for Students(Steelman et al., 2004), and validated it for use with elementary, middle, and high school students in Korea. We also investigated construct e q uivalence of this scale across the school levels. For this study, reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis ( C FA), correlation analysis, and multi- G rou p C FA were a pp lied to check the p sychometric p ro p erties of the K-FESS. First, the K-FESS with 23 items was acce p ted that only one item had been excluded from the original version through translation and content validation p rocedure. Second, the five-factor solution was p roduced by C FA and it exhibited good reliability and validity. T hird, the construct e q uivalence of the K-FESS across the school levels was confirmed. T his means that the K-FESS can be used as a common scale for all school levels. Fourth, the latent mean analyses revealed that the elementary school students had significantly higher feedback environment p erce p tions than those in other school levels. H owever the latent mean differences between middle and high school students were inconsistent across the subscales. Finally, im p lications for the a pp lied use of the K-FESS in Korea are discussed.","PeriodicalId":198625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","volume":"656 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2020.23.2.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

T he main p ur p ose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Feedback Environment Scale for Students(K-FESS). T he feedback environment is a contextual as p ect of the feedback p rocess and the feedback-oriented culture influences considerably the learner ' s acce p tance of feedback and whether they reflect this in their behavior. N evertheless, there are few research related to the effects of the feedback environment in the classroom assessment of Korea. T herefore, in this study, we utili z ed the Feedback Environment Scale for Students(Steelman et al., 2004), and validated it for use with elementary, middle, and high school students in Korea. We also investigated construct e q uivalence of this scale across the school levels. For this study, reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis ( C FA), correlation analysis, and multi- G rou p C FA were a pp lied to check the p sychometric p ro p erties of the K-FESS. First, the K-FESS with 23 items was acce p ted that only one item had been excluded from the original version through translation and content validation p rocedure. Second, the five-factor solution was p roduced by C FA and it exhibited good reliability and validity. T hird, the construct e q uivalence of the K-FESS across the school levels was confirmed. T his means that the K-FESS can be used as a common scale for all school levels. Fourth, the latent mean analyses revealed that the elementary school students had significantly higher feedback environment p erce p tions than those in other school levels. H owever the latent mean differences between middle and high school students were inconsistent across the subscales. Finally, im p lications for the a pp lied use of the K-FESS in Korea are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩文学生反馈环境量表(K-FESS)的验证
本研究的主要目的是验证韩国版的学生反馈环境量表(K-FESS)。反馈环境是反馈过程的一个上下文方面,以反馈为导向的文化对学习者对反馈的接受程度以及他们是否将其反映在他们的行为中有很大影响。然而,韩国很少有关于反馈环境在课堂评价中的作用的研究。因此,在本研究中,我们使用了学生反馈环境量表(Steelman et al., 2004),并对韩国的小学、初中和高中学生进行了验证。我们还调查了该量表在各个学校水平上的建构性。本研究采用信度分析、验证性因子分析(C FA)、相关分析和多G组C FA检验K-FESS的p对称性。首先,对包含23个题目的K-FESS进行检索,经过翻译和内容验证,只有1个题目被排除在原版本中。其次,用C - FA法得到了五因子解,具有良好的信度和效度。第三,在学校层面上验证了K-FESS的构效性。这意味着K-FESS可以作为所有学校级别的通用量表。第四,潜均值分析显示,小学生的反馈环境满意度显著高于其他学校水平。然而,初中生和高中生之间的潜在平均差异在各分量表上并不一致。最后,讨论了K-FESS在韩国的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Validation of Teacher's Educational Text readability Evaluation through a Cloze Test for Elementary and Middle School Students Exploration of motor development evidence reflected in the content system of the 2022 revised physical education curriculum and Derivation of future tasks Exploring high school students' formative assessment perception types and influencing factors in Korean language classes Analysis of Trends in Mathematics Achievement of Korean Middle School Students in the Recent 5 Cycles of TIMSS A study on the evaluation of foundational literacy with the case of BC, Canada and Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1