“This Is Not a Sex-Education Class, This Is Biology!”

Louisa Tomas, Donna L. Rigano
{"title":"“This Is Not a Sex-Education Class, This Is Biology!”","authors":"Louisa Tomas, Donna L. Rigano","doi":"10.1163/9789004377912_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arousal of negative emotions like frustration, embarrassment, disgust, shame and even anger are commonplace in science classrooms. In spite of teachers’ best efforts to provide engaging learning experiences that stimulate students’ curiosity and interest, and evoke positive emotions like enjoyment and happiness, everyday occurrences can lead to negative experiences: a poor result on a science test, disagreements during group work, not understanding a new concept, or even sitting through a mundane lesson. In circumstances such as these, students must regulate their negative emotions so that they remain engaged and ready to learn. In this chapter, we draw upon James Gross’ (1998) process model of emotion regulation to examine the emotion regulation strategies employed by Year 8 students in two different cases, in order to manage negative emotions like frustration, anger, embarrassment and shame as they learnt about two different controversial issues in science, coal seam gas mining and assisted reproductive technology. In the first case, students intrinsically regulated negative emotions like frustration, elicited by an ongoing group work task, by thinking differently about the challenges of working collaboratively. In the second case, students employed other strategies to deal with the embarrassment they experienced during a lesson on human reproduction, like choosing to divert their attention and acknowledging that there was nothing to be embarrassed about. In this class, the science teacher also played an important role in helping some students to manage their shame, disgust, and embarrassment extrinsically. In this example, the teacher's ability to identify how her students were feeling was important. To this end, we also outline a key data source for our research and discuss its utility in the science classroom: the emotion diary, a self-report instrument for identifying students' emotions. The findings of our research highlight the different ways in which students' emotions can be elicited in the science classroom, and that when learning about controversial issues, it's not always the issue itself that elicits the strongest feelings. At the end of the chapter, we discuss the implications of our research for supporting students' emotion regulation in the science classroom, and identify avenues for further research.","PeriodicalId":149059,"journal":{"name":"Eventful Learning","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eventful Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004377912_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The arousal of negative emotions like frustration, embarrassment, disgust, shame and even anger are commonplace in science classrooms. In spite of teachers’ best efforts to provide engaging learning experiences that stimulate students’ curiosity and interest, and evoke positive emotions like enjoyment and happiness, everyday occurrences can lead to negative experiences: a poor result on a science test, disagreements during group work, not understanding a new concept, or even sitting through a mundane lesson. In circumstances such as these, students must regulate their negative emotions so that they remain engaged and ready to learn. In this chapter, we draw upon James Gross’ (1998) process model of emotion regulation to examine the emotion regulation strategies employed by Year 8 students in two different cases, in order to manage negative emotions like frustration, anger, embarrassment and shame as they learnt about two different controversial issues in science, coal seam gas mining and assisted reproductive technology. In the first case, students intrinsically regulated negative emotions like frustration, elicited by an ongoing group work task, by thinking differently about the challenges of working collaboratively. In the second case, students employed other strategies to deal with the embarrassment they experienced during a lesson on human reproduction, like choosing to divert their attention and acknowledging that there was nothing to be embarrassed about. In this class, the science teacher also played an important role in helping some students to manage their shame, disgust, and embarrassment extrinsically. In this example, the teacher's ability to identify how her students were feeling was important. To this end, we also outline a key data source for our research and discuss its utility in the science classroom: the emotion diary, a self-report instrument for identifying students' emotions. The findings of our research highlight the different ways in which students' emotions can be elicited in the science classroom, and that when learning about controversial issues, it's not always the issue itself that elicits the strongest feelings. At the end of the chapter, we discuss the implications of our research for supporting students' emotion regulation in the science classroom, and identify avenues for further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这不是性教育课,这是生物学课!”
沮丧、尴尬、厌恶、羞耻甚至愤怒等负面情绪的唤起在科学课堂上很常见。尽管教师尽了最大的努力提供引人入胜的学习体验,激发学生的好奇心和兴趣,唤起快乐和幸福等积极情绪,但日常生活中发生的事情可能会导致消极的经历:科学测试成绩不佳,小组工作中出现分歧,不理解新概念,甚至坐着上一节平凡的课。在这样的环境下,学生必须调节自己的负面情绪,这样他们才能保持专注,做好学习的准备。在本章中,我们借鉴James Gross(1998)的情绪调节过程模型来研究八年级学生在两种不同情况下采用的情绪调节策略,以便在他们了解到科学中两个不同的有争议的问题时管理沮丧,愤怒,尴尬和羞耻等负面情绪,煤层气开采和辅助生殖技术。在第一种情况下,学生通过对合作挑战的不同思考,内在地调节了由正在进行的小组工作任务引起的沮丧等负面情绪。在第二种情况下,学生们采用了其他策略来处理他们在人类生殖课上遇到的尴尬,比如选择转移注意力,承认没有什么好尴尬的。在这堂课上,科学老师也扮演了重要的角色,帮助一些学生管理他们外在的羞耻、厌恶和尴尬。在这个例子中,老师识别学生感受的能力很重要。为此,我们还概述了我们研究的一个关键数据源,并讨论了它在科学课堂中的实用性:情绪日记,一种用于识别学生情绪的自我报告工具。我们的研究结果强调了在科学课堂上激发学生情绪的不同方式,当学习有争议的问题时,并不总是问题本身引起最强烈的感受。在本章的最后,我们讨论了我们的研究对支持学生在科学课堂中的情绪调节的影响,并确定了进一步研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Events in Learning Science The Resolution of Frustration in Middle School Science Classes Science Demonstrations as Mediators of Emotional Experiences Methodological Bricolage Negative Emotional Events During Science Inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1