Surviving the Borrower: Assumption, Modification, and Access to Mortgage Information after a Death or Divorce

S. Mancini, Alyssa M. Cohen
{"title":"Surviving the Borrower: Assumption, Modification, and Access to Mortgage Information after a Death or Divorce","authors":"S. Mancini, Alyssa M. Cohen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2498188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The death of a borrower too often brings the surviving spouse or other heirs to the brink of foreclosure. Transfer of the marital home to a non-borrower spouse through divorce may lead to the same problems. Mortgage servicers tell these successor homeowners that because they are not the borrower on the loan, they are not entitled to any information about the mortgage secured by their home and cannot apply for a loan modification, even if they are struggling with the payments. In fact, successors have a right to information, the right to assume liability for the loan, and the right to apply for a modification. In the midst of the foreclosure crisis, many academics have examined state-specific laws, mortgage securitization, and the financial incentives that impede efforts to mitigate foreclosures. No scholarly paper has explored the legal issues affecting successor homeowners who seek information and payment relief after a transfer of the family home. In this article, we provide a comprehensive discussion of the federal privacy regulations, statutory limits on enforcement of due-on-sale clauses (specifically the exceptions contained in the Garn-St Germain Act), state contract law, and federal loan modification programs that determine the rights of this vulnerable population. In a time of increased focus on regulation of mortgage lenders and servicers, we also recommend policy changes that would clarify existing rights and better prevent avoidable foreclosures.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2498188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The death of a borrower too often brings the surviving spouse or other heirs to the brink of foreclosure. Transfer of the marital home to a non-borrower spouse through divorce may lead to the same problems. Mortgage servicers tell these successor homeowners that because they are not the borrower on the loan, they are not entitled to any information about the mortgage secured by their home and cannot apply for a loan modification, even if they are struggling with the payments. In fact, successors have a right to information, the right to assume liability for the loan, and the right to apply for a modification. In the midst of the foreclosure crisis, many academics have examined state-specific laws, mortgage securitization, and the financial incentives that impede efforts to mitigate foreclosures. No scholarly paper has explored the legal issues affecting successor homeowners who seek information and payment relief after a transfer of the family home. In this article, we provide a comprehensive discussion of the federal privacy regulations, statutory limits on enforcement of due-on-sale clauses (specifically the exceptions contained in the Garn-St Germain Act), state contract law, and federal loan modification programs that determine the rights of this vulnerable population. In a time of increased focus on regulation of mortgage lenders and servicers, we also recommend policy changes that would clarify existing rights and better prevent avoidable foreclosures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸存的借款人:假设,修改,并获得抵押贷款信息后死亡或离婚
借款人的死亡往往会使其幸存的配偶或其他继承人处于丧失抵押品赎回权的边缘。通过离婚将婚姻住房转让给无借款人的配偶也可能导致同样的问题。抵押贷款服务机构告诉这些接替房主,因为他们不是贷款的借款人,他们无权获得有关房屋抵押贷款的任何信息,也不能申请贷款修改,即使他们在还款方面遇到困难。事实上,继承者有知情权、对贷款承担责任的权利、申请变更的权利。在丧失抵押品赎回权危机中,许多学者研究了各州的具体法律、抵押贷款证券化以及阻碍减轻丧失抵押品赎回权努力的财政激励措施。没有学术论文探讨过影响继承者在家庭房屋转让后寻求信息和支付救济的法律问题。在本文中,我们将全面讨论联邦隐私法规、强制执行销售费用条款的法定限制(特别是《加恩-圣日耳曼法案》中包含的例外情况)、州合同法和联邦贷款修改计划,这些都决定了弱势群体的权利。在对抵押贷款机构和服务机构的监管日益受到关注之际,我们还建议改变政策,澄清现有权利,更好地防止可避免的止赎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1