Testing Local Descriptive Norms and Salience of Enforcement Action: A Field Experiment to Increase Tax Collection

C. Larkin, M. Sanders, Isabelle Andresen, Felicity Algate
{"title":"Testing Local Descriptive Norms and Salience of Enforcement Action: A Field Experiment to Increase Tax Collection","authors":"C. Larkin, M. Sanders, Isabelle Andresen, Felicity Algate","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3167575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of behavioral science interventions, and particularly social norms, in tax compliance is a growing industry for scholars and practitioners alike in recent years. However, the causal mechanism of these interventions is unknown, where effects could be explained by a pro-social desire to support one’s community, conditional cooperation, desire to conform, or fear of reprisals. We conduct a field experiment in local government taxation in the United Kingdom which tests the effectiveness of a social (descriptive) norm against a control condition and against messages that highlight the enforcement process. The social norm outperforms enforcement salience, suggesting that this explanation, although more powerful than the control, does not fully explain compliance effects. This study further provides evidence that social norm type interventions can be effective at the subnational level, a context where previous work has shown they may produce null effects.","PeriodicalId":114907,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Issues eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The use of behavioral science interventions, and particularly social norms, in tax compliance is a growing industry for scholars and practitioners alike in recent years. However, the causal mechanism of these interventions is unknown, where effects could be explained by a pro-social desire to support one’s community, conditional cooperation, desire to conform, or fear of reprisals. We conduct a field experiment in local government taxation in the United Kingdom which tests the effectiveness of a social (descriptive) norm against a control condition and against messages that highlight the enforcement process. The social norm outperforms enforcement salience, suggesting that this explanation, although more powerful than the control, does not fully explain compliance effects. This study further provides evidence that social norm type interventions can be effective at the subnational level, a context where previous work has shown they may produce null effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验地方描述性规范与执法行为显著性:增加税收征管的实地实验
近年来,对学者和从业者来说,在税收合规方面使用行为科学干预,特别是社会规范,是一个不断发展的行业。然而,这些干预措施的因果机制尚不清楚,其影响可以通过支持社区的亲社会愿望、有条件的合作、顺从的愿望或对报复的恐惧来解释。我们对英国的地方政府税收进行了实地实验,测试了社会(描述性)规范对控制条件和强调执行过程的信息的有效性。社会规范优于强制执行的显著性,这表明这种解释虽然比控制更有力,但并不能完全解释合规效应。这项研究进一步提供了证据,证明社会规范类型的干预措施在次国家层面上是有效的,而之前的研究表明它们可能产生无效效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the Performance Puzzle of Digitalization: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms Korea’s Strategy on Trade Agreements with Developing Countries in Africa and the Pacific Regions The Impact of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performance How Inductive and Deductive Generalization Shape the Guilt by Association Phenomenon Among Firms: Theory and Evidence The Role of National Culture in Financial Literacy: Cross-Country Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1