{"title":"Between Political Meritocracy and Participatory Democracy: Toward Realist Confucian Democracy","authors":"D. Jin","doi":"10.1163/24683949-12340086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn this article, I examine the textual underpinnings of participatory Confucian democracy and Confucian meritocracy and propose realist Confucian democracy as an alternative following a balanced reading of classic Confucianism. I argue that Confucian plebeian values do not square with the political meritocrats’ (Daniel A. Bell and Tongdong Bai) advocacy for meritocratic rule while Confucian elitist values undermine participatory democrats’ (Sor-hoon Tan and Stephen Angle) ardor for justifications of active democratic participation. A shared difficulty with both groups is that they tend to overuse one aspect of Confucianism while leaving the status of other elements in limbo. The discussion of participatory democracy and meritocracy is followed by the introduction of an eclectic reading that strikes a dynamic balance between elitist and plebeian values in Confucianism, and which points to the wide gamut of realist democracy that combines democratic election with strong leadership.","PeriodicalId":160891,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Dialogue","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24683949-12340086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this article, I examine the textual underpinnings of participatory Confucian democracy and Confucian meritocracy and propose realist Confucian democracy as an alternative following a balanced reading of classic Confucianism. I argue that Confucian plebeian values do not square with the political meritocrats’ (Daniel A. Bell and Tongdong Bai) advocacy for meritocratic rule while Confucian elitist values undermine participatory democrats’ (Sor-hoon Tan and Stephen Angle) ardor for justifications of active democratic participation. A shared difficulty with both groups is that they tend to overuse one aspect of Confucianism while leaving the status of other elements in limbo. The discussion of participatory democracy and meritocracy is followed by the introduction of an eclectic reading that strikes a dynamic balance between elitist and plebeian values in Confucianism, and which points to the wide gamut of realist democracy that combines democratic election with strong leadership.
在这篇文章中,我考察了参与式儒家民主和儒家精英政治的文本基础,并提出了现实主义的儒家民主,作为对经典儒家思想的平衡阅读之后的另一种选择。我认为儒家的平民价值观与政治精英(Daniel A. Bell和白桐东)倡导的精英统治不一致,而儒家的精英价值观破坏了参与民主(sorhoon Tan和Stephen Angle)为积极民主参与辩护的热情。这两个群体的共同困难是,他们倾向于过度使用儒家思想的一个方面,而使其他元素的地位处于不确定状态。在讨论参与式民主和精英政治之后,介绍了一种折衷的解读,在儒家的精英和平民价值观之间取得了动态平衡,并指出了广泛的现实主义民主,将民主选举与强有力的领导相结合。