Reducing the Treatment Gap for Psychiatric Disorders – The Role of Accredited Social Health Activists in South India

Shivam Gakkhar, P. Nirisha, Gajanan Sabhahit, Patley Rahul, Nithesh Kulal, N. Harshitha, N. Manjunatha, J. Thirthalli, Naveen Kumar, A. Manjappa, Rajani Parthasarthy, P. Chand, Sanjeev Arora, Suresh Badamath
{"title":"Reducing the Treatment Gap for Psychiatric Disorders – The Role of Accredited Social Health Activists in South India","authors":"Shivam Gakkhar, P. Nirisha, Gajanan Sabhahit, Patley Rahul, Nithesh Kulal, N. Harshitha, N. Manjunatha, J. Thirthalli, Naveen Kumar, A. Manjappa, Rajani Parthasarthy, P. Chand, Sanjeev Arora, Suresh Badamath","doi":"10.4103/wsp.wsp_14_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health work carried out by accredited social health activists (ASHAs) on reduction of the “treatment gap” for severe mental disorders (SMD), common mental disorders (CMDs), and substance use disorders (SUDs) in rural communities. Methods: This study is an offshoot of a larger randomized controlled trial designed to comprehensively compare the effectiveness of two methods of training and empowering grassroots-level workers in mental health. Three primary health centers (PHCs) were selected (simple random sampling) as the study group (SG). Thirty-five ASHAs were trained and mentored (National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences-Extension of Community Health Outcomes model of skilled capacity building using digital technology) for a period of 18 months in identifying/counseling/referral of commonly prevalent mental health problems in the community. Control group (CG) PHCs' ASHAs (n = 36) received “training as usual” (i.e. 1 day in person classroom training session). Both the groups were regularly contacted by the research team to monitor for progress. Reduction in “treatment gap” was evaluated using pre–post design for SG and CG separately, and the same was compared between SG and CG. Results: A total of 35,023 adults were screened, and positives were identified, counseled, and referred for care and treatment. Treatment gap for SMDs and SUDs reduced significantly both in SG and CG (SMDs: 10% vs. 38%, respectively; P = 0.03 for both; SUDs: 51% vs. 70% respectively; P < 0.001 for both) while it increased for CMDs (13% vs. 14% P < 0.01 and 0.09, respectively). Comparatively speaking, SG fared better for SUDs (P < 0.05), and CG did better for SMDs (P < 0.05). It was unequivocal for CMDs (P = 0.48). Conclusion: ASHAs could be effectively empowered to carry out mental health work resulting in meaningful reduction of treatment gap for the priority mental illnesses including SMD and SUDs.","PeriodicalId":285109,"journal":{"name":"World Social Psychiatry","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wsp.wsp_14_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health work carried out by accredited social health activists (ASHAs) on reduction of the “treatment gap” for severe mental disorders (SMD), common mental disorders (CMDs), and substance use disorders (SUDs) in rural communities. Methods: This study is an offshoot of a larger randomized controlled trial designed to comprehensively compare the effectiveness of two methods of training and empowering grassroots-level workers in mental health. Three primary health centers (PHCs) were selected (simple random sampling) as the study group (SG). Thirty-five ASHAs were trained and mentored (National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences-Extension of Community Health Outcomes model of skilled capacity building using digital technology) for a period of 18 months in identifying/counseling/referral of commonly prevalent mental health problems in the community. Control group (CG) PHCs' ASHAs (n = 36) received “training as usual” (i.e. 1 day in person classroom training session). Both the groups were regularly contacted by the research team to monitor for progress. Reduction in “treatment gap” was evaluated using pre–post design for SG and CG separately, and the same was compared between SG and CG. Results: A total of 35,023 adults were screened, and positives were identified, counseled, and referred for care and treatment. Treatment gap for SMDs and SUDs reduced significantly both in SG and CG (SMDs: 10% vs. 38%, respectively; P = 0.03 for both; SUDs: 51% vs. 70% respectively; P < 0.001 for both) while it increased for CMDs (13% vs. 14% P < 0.01 and 0.09, respectively). Comparatively speaking, SG fared better for SUDs (P < 0.05), and CG did better for SMDs (P < 0.05). It was unequivocal for CMDs (P = 0.48). Conclusion: ASHAs could be effectively empowered to carry out mental health work resulting in meaningful reduction of treatment gap for the priority mental illnesses including SMD and SUDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少精神疾病的治疗差距——南印度认可的社会卫生活动家的作用
目的:本研究的目的是评估经认可的社会卫生活动家(ASHAs)开展的精神卫生工作在缩小农村社区严重精神障碍(SMD)、普通精神障碍(CMDs)和物质使用障碍(SUDs)的“治疗差距”方面的有效性。方法:本研究是一个更大的随机对照试验的分支,旨在全面比较两种培训和授权基层工人心理健康的方法的有效性。选取3个初级保健中心(PHCs)作为研究组(SG)。对35名asha进行了为期18个月的培训和指导(国家精神卫生和神经科学研究所——利用数字技术进行熟练能力建设的社区卫生成果推广模型),以确定/咨询/转诊社区普遍存在的精神卫生问题。对照组(CG)初级保健医生的ASHAs (n = 36)接受“照常培训”(即1天的面对面课堂培训)。研究小组定期与这两组人联系,以监测进展情况。采用前后设计分别评价SG和CG的“治疗间隙”减少情况,并比较SG和CG之间的“治疗间隙”减少情况。结果:共有35,023名成年人进行了筛查,并确定了阳性,咨询,并转介到护理和治疗。在SG和CG中,smd和sud的治疗差距均显著缩小(smd分别为10%和38%;P = 0.03;sud:分别为51%和70%;两者P < 0.001),而慢性阻塞性肺病则增加(13%比14%,P分别< 0.01和0.09)。相比之下,SG对SUDs的疗效更好(P < 0.05),而CG对SMDs的疗效更好(P < 0.05)。对于慢性阻塞性肺病,这是明确的(P = 0.48)。结论:asha可以有效地开展精神卫生工作,从而有效地缩小SMD和SUDs等重点精神疾病的治疗差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Belonging is to Social Psychiatry What Attachment is to Child Psychiatry Prison Mental Health in the United States of America and India: A Dual Perspective Patient and Public Involvement in Developing and Testing Mental Health-care Interventions: Strategies and Reflections from Three Research Programs Recovery from Mental Illness: From Social Control to the Bio-, through the Psycho-, toward the Social Essence of Recovery The Onslaught of Civilization and Emerging Mental Health Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1