Modelling Stem Diameter Variability in Pinus caribaea (Morelet) Plantations in South West Nigeria

P. O. Adesoye
{"title":"Modelling Stem Diameter Variability in Pinus caribaea (Morelet) Plantations in South West Nigeria","authors":"P. O. Adesoye","doi":"10.7747/JFES.2016.32.3.280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stem diameter variability is an essential inventory result that provides useful information in forest management decisions. Little has been done to explore the modelling potentials of standard deviation (SDD) and coefficient of variation (CVD) of diameter at breast height (dbh). This study, therefore, was aimed at developing and testing models for predicting SDD and CVD in stands of Pinus caribaea Morelet (pine) in south west Nigeria. Sixty temporary sample plots of size 20 m×20 m, ranging between 15 and 37 years were sampled, covering the entire range of pine in south west Nigeria. The dbh (cm), total and merchantable heights (m), number of stems and age of trees were measured within each plot. Basal area (m), site index (m), relative spacing and percentile positions of dbh at 24, 63, 76 and 93 (i.e. P24, P63, P76 and P93) were computed from measured variables for each plot. Linear mixed model (LMM) was used to test the effects of locations (fixed) and plots (random). Six candidate models (3 for SDD and 3 for CVD), using three categories of explanatory variables (i.e. (i) only stand size measures, (ii) distribution measures, and (iii) combination of i and ii). The best model was chosen based on smaller relative standard error (RSE), prediction residual sum of squares (PRESS), corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) and larger coefficient of determination (R). The results of the LMM indicated that location and plot effects were not significant. The CVD and SDD models having only measures of percentiles (i.e. P24 and P93) as predictors produced better predictions than others. However, CVD model produced the overall best predictions, because of the lower RSE and stability in measuring variability across different stand developments. The results demonstrate the potentials of CVD in modelling stem diameter variability in relationship with percentiles variables.","PeriodicalId":237267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forest and environmental science","volume":"08 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forest and environmental science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2016.32.3.280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stem diameter variability is an essential inventory result that provides useful information in forest management decisions. Little has been done to explore the modelling potentials of standard deviation (SDD) and coefficient of variation (CVD) of diameter at breast height (dbh). This study, therefore, was aimed at developing and testing models for predicting SDD and CVD in stands of Pinus caribaea Morelet (pine) in south west Nigeria. Sixty temporary sample plots of size 20 m×20 m, ranging between 15 and 37 years were sampled, covering the entire range of pine in south west Nigeria. The dbh (cm), total and merchantable heights (m), number of stems and age of trees were measured within each plot. Basal area (m), site index (m), relative spacing and percentile positions of dbh at 24, 63, 76 and 93 (i.e. P24, P63, P76 and P93) were computed from measured variables for each plot. Linear mixed model (LMM) was used to test the effects of locations (fixed) and plots (random). Six candidate models (3 for SDD and 3 for CVD), using three categories of explanatory variables (i.e. (i) only stand size measures, (ii) distribution measures, and (iii) combination of i and ii). The best model was chosen based on smaller relative standard error (RSE), prediction residual sum of squares (PRESS), corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) and larger coefficient of determination (R). The results of the LMM indicated that location and plot effects were not significant. The CVD and SDD models having only measures of percentiles (i.e. P24 and P93) as predictors produced better predictions than others. However, CVD model produced the overall best predictions, because of the lower RSE and stability in measuring variability across different stand developments. The results demonstrate the potentials of CVD in modelling stem diameter variability in relationship with percentiles variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚西南部加勒比松(Morelet)人工林茎径变异的建模
茎径变异性是一项重要的清查结果,可为森林经营决策提供有用的信息。关于胸围高度(dbh)直径的标准差(SDD)和变异系数(CVD)的建模潜力的研究很少。因此,本研究旨在开发和测试预测尼日利亚西南部加勒比松林分SDD和CVD的模型。六十临时样本块大小20 m×20 m,介于15 - 37年采样,覆盖整个范围的松树在尼日利亚西南部。在每个样地内测量树木胸径(cm)、总高和可售高(m)、茎数和树龄。基底面积(m),网站指数(m),相对间距和百分位的位置胸径在24,63年、76年和93年(例如P24, P63 P76和P93)从测量变量计算为每个情节。采用线性混合模型(LMM)检验地点(固定)和图(随机)的影响。6个候选模型(3个用于SDD, 3个用于CVD),分别使用3类解释变量(1)单独的林分尺度、2个分布尺度和3个i和ii的组合),基于较小的相对标准误差(RSE)、预测残差平方和(PRESS)、修正的赤池信息准则(AICc)和较大的决定系数(R)选择最佳模型。LMM结果表明,区位效应和地块效应不显著。CVD和SDD模型仅使用百分位数(即P24和P93)作为预测因子,产生了比其他模型更好的预测。然而,CVD模型的预测结果总体上是最好的,因为RSE较低,并且在测量不同林分发育的变异性方面具有稳定性。结果表明,CVD在模拟茎直径变化与百分位数变量的关系方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Selection of Nursery Polybag Size on Effect of Growth and Quality of Khaya Anthotheca (Meliaceae) Seedlings under Nursery Condition in Bangladesh Effect of Plant Growth Regulators in In Vitro Culture of Hippophae rhamnoides Identification, Enzymatic Activity, and Decay Ability of Basidiomycetous Fungi Isolated from the Decayed Bark of Mongolian Oak (Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb.) Physico-Mechanical Properties of Cement-Bonded Boards Produced from Mixture of Corn Cob Particles and Gmelina arborea Sawdust Development and Application of a Forest Education Program Using the ADDIE Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1