KDM as the Underlying Metamodel in Architecture-Conformance Checking

F. Chagas, R. Durelli, Ricardo Terra, V. V. D. Camargo
{"title":"KDM as the Underlying Metamodel in Architecture-Conformance Checking","authors":"F. Chagas, R. Durelli, Ricardo Terra, V. V. D. Camargo","doi":"10.1145/2973839.2973851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two important artifacts in any Architecture-Conformance Checking (ACC) approach: i) the representation of the PA and ii) the representation of the CA. Many times, inside the same ACC approach, distinct meta-models are adopted for representing the PA and the CA. Besides, it is common the adoption of meta-models unsuitable for representing architectural details. This heterogeneity makes the checking algorithms complex since they must cope with instances that comply with two different meta-models or do not have proper architectural abstractions. KDM is an ISO meta-model proposed by OMG whose goal is to become the standard representation of systems in modernization tools. It is able to represent many aspects of a software system, including source code details, architectural abstractions and the dependencies between them. However, up to this moment, there is no research showing how KDM can be used in ACC approaches. Therefore we present an investigation of adopting KDM as the unique meta-model for representing PA and CA in ACC approaches. We have developed a three-steps ACC approach called ArchKDM. In the first step a DSL assists in the PA specification; in the second step an Eclipse plug-in provides the necessary support and in the last step the checking is conducted. We have also evaluate our approach using two real world systems and the results were very promising, revealing no false positives or negatives.","PeriodicalId":415612,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the XXX Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the XXX Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2973839.2973851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There are two important artifacts in any Architecture-Conformance Checking (ACC) approach: i) the representation of the PA and ii) the representation of the CA. Many times, inside the same ACC approach, distinct meta-models are adopted for representing the PA and the CA. Besides, it is common the adoption of meta-models unsuitable for representing architectural details. This heterogeneity makes the checking algorithms complex since they must cope with instances that comply with two different meta-models or do not have proper architectural abstractions. KDM is an ISO meta-model proposed by OMG whose goal is to become the standard representation of systems in modernization tools. It is able to represent many aspects of a software system, including source code details, architectural abstractions and the dependencies between them. However, up to this moment, there is no research showing how KDM can be used in ACC approaches. Therefore we present an investigation of adopting KDM as the unique meta-model for representing PA and CA in ACC approaches. We have developed a three-steps ACC approach called ArchKDM. In the first step a DSL assists in the PA specification; in the second step an Eclipse plug-in provides the necessary support and in the last step the checking is conducted. We have also evaluate our approach using two real world systems and the results were very promising, revealing no false positives or negatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KDM作为架构一致性检查中的底层元模型
在任何架构一致性检查(ACC)方法中都有两个重要的工件:i) PA的表示和ii) CA的表示。很多时候,在相同的ACC方法中,采用不同的元模型来表示PA和CA。此外,采用不适合表示架构细节的元模型是很常见的。这种异构性使得检查算法变得复杂,因为它们必须处理符合两个不同元模型的实例,或者没有适当的体系结构抽象。KDM是OMG提出的ISO元模型,其目标是成为现代化工具中系统的标准表示。它能够表示软件系统的许多方面,包括源代码细节、架构抽象和它们之间的依赖关系。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究表明KDM如何在ACC方法中使用。因此,我们提出了采用KDM作为ACC方法中表示PA和CA的唯一元模型的研究。我们已经开发了一种称为ArchKDM的三步ACC方法。在第一步中,DSL协助PA规范;在第二步中,Eclipse插件提供必要的支持,在最后一步中执行检查。我们还用两个真实世界的系统评估了我们的方法,结果非常有希望,没有出现假阳性或假阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterizing DevOps by Hearing Multiple Voices A Model Driven Transformation Development Process for Model to Model Transformation Automated API Documentation with Tutorials Generated From Stack Overflow Model Verification of Dynamic Software Product Lines An Exploratory Study of Exception Handling Behavior in Evolving Android and Java Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1