Decision-making involving low probability high consequence events under risk and uncertainty

R. Ilin, G. Rogova
{"title":"Decision-making involving low probability high consequence events under risk and uncertainty","authors":"R. Ilin, G. Rogova","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2017.7929587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in progress described in this paper addresses the problem of decision making in situations involving low probability high consequence events. The traditional Expected Utility Model (EU) has significant limitations in such circumstances as documented in multiple research results. The models discussed in this paper is an adaptation of the Multiple Quantile Model (MQT) representing a rational decision support scheme suited to regular as well as low probability high consequence events to the complex dynamic scenarios, in which decision making has to be based on highly uncertain, often unreliable heterogeneous data and information. The core of this scheme is a combination of the Multiple Quantile Theory with the Transferable Belief Model (TBM) and Anytime Decision making. An example of this approach with numeric simulations is given and the directions of future work are outlined.","PeriodicalId":252066,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2017.7929587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Research in progress described in this paper addresses the problem of decision making in situations involving low probability high consequence events. The traditional Expected Utility Model (EU) has significant limitations in such circumstances as documented in multiple research results. The models discussed in this paper is an adaptation of the Multiple Quantile Model (MQT) representing a rational decision support scheme suited to regular as well as low probability high consequence events to the complex dynamic scenarios, in which decision making has to be based on highly uncertain, often unreliable heterogeneous data and information. The core of this scheme is a combination of the Multiple Quantile Theory with the Transferable Belief Model (TBM) and Anytime Decision making. An example of this approach with numeric simulations is given and the directions of future work are outlined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在风险和不确定性条件下,涉及低概率高后果事件的决策
本文所描述的正在进行的研究解决了在涉及低概率高后果事件的情况下的决策问题。传统的期望实用新型(EU)在这样的情况下有明显的局限性,许多研究结果都证明了这一点。本文所讨论的模型是对多分位模型(MQT)的一种改进,它代表了一种适用于规则事件和低概率高后果事件的合理决策支持方案,以适应复杂的动态场景,在这些场景中,决策必须基于高度不确定、往往不可靠的异构数据和信息。该方案的核心是将多分位数理论与可转移信念模型(TBM)和随时决策相结合。最后给出了该方法的数值模拟实例,并对今后的工作方向进行了概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rightward attentional bias in windshield displays: Implication towards external human machine interfaces for self-driving cars Situation-based ontologies for a computational framework for identity focusing on crime scenes Automation bias with a conversational interface: User confirmation of misparsed information Using context and robot-human communication to resolve unexpected situational conflicts A model based on rough sets for situation comprehension and projection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1