Fighting the Asante

E. Spiers
{"title":"Fighting the Asante","authors":"E. Spiers","doi":"10.7765/9781526137913.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Wolseley’s march to Kumasi’ has been described as ‘one of the military dramas of the Victorian age’. Britain exercised an informal protectorate over parts of the Gold Coast from the early 1830s, the feverridden region traditionally known as ‘a white man’s grave’. As two previous British expeditions in 1823 and 1863–64 had suffered serious losses, the Colonial Office resolved not to send another British force to the Gold Coast, even after the Asante (pronounced Ashanti) invaded the protectorate in 1873. Although a composite force headed by a detachment of Marines under Colonel Festing thwarted the invasion at Elmina (13 June 1873), panic gripped the authorities at Cape Coast Castle. On 13 August the British Government appointed Sir Garnet Wolseley as administrator and commander-in-chief on the Gold Coast and despatched him, with twenty-seven special-service officers, to work with the local Fante tribesmen to resist the Asante. Following his arrival in September, Wolseley promptly requested British reinforcements, planned a short campaign over the less hazardous months of December, January and February, and then decisively defeated the Asante in battle before sacking their capital, Kumase (6 February 1874). He earned enormous plaudits for this campaign, which cost under £800,000 and involved minimal casualties. Yet the campaign aroused its share of controversy, both at the time and subsequently. While special correspondents, such as Henry M. Stanley and Winwoode Reade, berated the failure of his transport arrangements and the risks involved in a prompt evacuation of Kumase, some modern commentators argue that Wolseley discounted the military worth of the Fante precipitately. Few deny that Wolseley and his forces conducted a remarkable campaign, overcoming formidable natural obstacles while incurring relatively few casualties, and several commentators, taking their cue from Cardwell, regard this campaign as a vindication of his reforms. In reviewing the experiences of some thirty-five officers and men from all C H A P T E R O N E","PeriodicalId":125869,"journal":{"name":"The Victorian soldier in Africa","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Victorian soldier in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137913.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Wolseley’s march to Kumasi’ has been described as ‘one of the military dramas of the Victorian age’. Britain exercised an informal protectorate over parts of the Gold Coast from the early 1830s, the feverridden region traditionally known as ‘a white man’s grave’. As two previous British expeditions in 1823 and 1863–64 had suffered serious losses, the Colonial Office resolved not to send another British force to the Gold Coast, even after the Asante (pronounced Ashanti) invaded the protectorate in 1873. Although a composite force headed by a detachment of Marines under Colonel Festing thwarted the invasion at Elmina (13 June 1873), panic gripped the authorities at Cape Coast Castle. On 13 August the British Government appointed Sir Garnet Wolseley as administrator and commander-in-chief on the Gold Coast and despatched him, with twenty-seven special-service officers, to work with the local Fante tribesmen to resist the Asante. Following his arrival in September, Wolseley promptly requested British reinforcements, planned a short campaign over the less hazardous months of December, January and February, and then decisively defeated the Asante in battle before sacking their capital, Kumase (6 February 1874). He earned enormous plaudits for this campaign, which cost under £800,000 and involved minimal casualties. Yet the campaign aroused its share of controversy, both at the time and subsequently. While special correspondents, such as Henry M. Stanley and Winwoode Reade, berated the failure of his transport arrangements and the risks involved in a prompt evacuation of Kumase, some modern commentators argue that Wolseley discounted the military worth of the Fante precipitately. Few deny that Wolseley and his forces conducted a remarkable campaign, overcoming formidable natural obstacles while incurring relatively few casualties, and several commentators, taking their cue from Cardwell, regard this campaign as a vindication of his reforms. In reviewing the experiences of some thirty-five officers and men from all C H A P T E R O N E
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与阿散蒂作战
《沃尔斯利向库马西进军》被形容为“维多利亚时代的军事剧之一”。从19世纪30年代初开始,英国对黄金海岸的部分地区实行了非正式的保护,这片发烧肆虐的地区传统上被称为“白人的坟墓”。由于英国在1823年和1863-64年的两次远征都遭受了严重损失,殖民地办事处决定不再向黄金海岸派遣另一支英国军队,即使在1873年阿散蒂人入侵这个保护国之后。虽然费斯廷上校率领的海军陆战队分队在埃尔米纳挫败了入侵(1873年6月13日),但海岸角城堡的当局却陷入了恐慌。8月13日,英国政府任命加内特·沃尔斯利爵士为黄金海岸的行政长官和总司令,并派遣他和27名特种部队军官,与当地的凡特部落一起抵抗阿桑蒂人。沃尔斯利在9月抵达后,立即请求英国增援,计划在危险较小的12月、1月和2月进行一次短暂的战役,然后在战斗中决定性地击败了阿散蒂人,洗劫了他们的首都熊濑(1874年2月6日)。他在这场耗资不到80万英镑、伤亡最少的战役中赢得了巨大的掌声。然而,这场运动在当时和后来都引起了争议。当特派记者,如亨利·m·斯坦利和温伍德·里德,严厉指责他的运输安排的失败和迅速撤离熊濑所涉及的风险时,一些现代评论员认为,沃尔斯利轻率地低估了凡特号的军事价值。很少有人否认沃尔斯利和他的部队进行了一次非凡的战役,克服了可怕的自然障碍,而伤亡相对较少,一些评论家从卡德威尔那里得到了启示,认为这次战役是他改革的证明。在检讨三十五名来自香港海关、海关、海关、海关、海关及海关的官兵的经验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Battling the Boers Abbreviations Glossary Campaigning in southern Africa Re-engaging the Boers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1