Improved software vulnerability patching techniques using CVSS and game theory

Louai A. Maghrabi, E. Pfluegel, Luluwah Al-Fagih, Roman Graf, Giuseppe Settanni, Florian Skopik
{"title":"Improved software vulnerability patching techniques using CVSS and game theory","authors":"Louai A. Maghrabi, E. Pfluegel, Luluwah Al-Fagih, Roman Graf, Giuseppe Settanni, Florian Skopik","doi":"10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2017.8074856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software vulnerability patching is a crucial part of vulnerability management and is informed by using effective vulnerability scoring techniques. The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) provides an open framework for assessing the severity of software vulnerabilities based on metrics capturing their individual, intrinsic characteristics. In this paper, we enhance the use of CVSS for vulnerability scoring with the help of game theory by modelling an attacker-defender scenario and arguing that, under the assumption of rational behaviour of the players, an effective vulnerability patching strategy could be achieved with an optimal strategy, solving the game. We have implemented our strategies as new functionality in the software tool CAESAIR [1]. This research builds on our previous work [2], where we have used CVSS to inform the design of the utility functions, by performing the Nash equilibrium analysis of the game. Our findings may result in more accurate defence strategies for system administrators.","PeriodicalId":203945,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Cyber Security And Protection Of Digital Services (Cyber Security)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Cyber Security And Protection Of Digital Services (Cyber Security)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2017.8074856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Software vulnerability patching is a crucial part of vulnerability management and is informed by using effective vulnerability scoring techniques. The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) provides an open framework for assessing the severity of software vulnerabilities based on metrics capturing their individual, intrinsic characteristics. In this paper, we enhance the use of CVSS for vulnerability scoring with the help of game theory by modelling an attacker-defender scenario and arguing that, under the assumption of rational behaviour of the players, an effective vulnerability patching strategy could be achieved with an optimal strategy, solving the game. We have implemented our strategies as new functionality in the software tool CAESAIR [1]. This research builds on our previous work [2], where we have used CVSS to inform the design of the utility functions, by performing the Nash equilibrium analysis of the game. Our findings may result in more accurate defence strategies for system administrators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进的软件漏洞修补技术使用CVSS和博弈论
软件漏洞修补是漏洞管理的重要组成部分,通过使用有效的漏洞评分技术来实现。通用漏洞评分系统(CVSS)提供了一个开放的框架,用于基于捕获其个体、内在特征的度量来评估软件漏洞的严重性。本文在博弈论的帮助下,通过建模攻击者-防御者场景,增强CVSS对漏洞评分的使用,并认为在假设参与者的理性行为下,可以通过最优策略实现有效的漏洞修补策略,从而解决博弈。我们已经在软件工具CAESAIR[1]中实现了我们的策略作为新功能。这项研究建立在我们之前的工作[2]的基础上,在那里我们使用CVSS来通知效用函数的设计,通过执行博弈的纳什均衡分析。我们的发现可能会为系统管理员提供更准确的防御策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Security operations centre: Situation awareness, threat intelligence and cybercrime ROPK++: An enhanced ROP attack detection framework for Linux operating system When eHealth meets the internet of things: Pervasive security and privacy challenges Foiling cyber attacks PrincessLocker analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1