Developing an Open Social Scholarship Collaboration: Lessons from INKE

Lynne Siemens
{"title":"Developing an Open Social Scholarship Collaboration: Lessons from INKE","authors":"Lynne Siemens","doi":"10.5334/KULA.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many academic teams and granting agencies undergo a process of reflection at the completion of research projects to understand lessons learned and develop best practice guidelines. Generally completed at the project’s end, these reviews focus on the actual research work accomplished with little discussion of the work relationships and process involved. As a result, some hard-earned lessons are forgotten or minimized through the passage of time. Additional learning about the nature of collaboration may be gained if this type of reflection occurs during the project’s life. Building on earlier examinations of INKE, this paper contributes to that discussion with an exploration of seventh and final year of a large-scale research project.Implementing New Knowledge Environment (INKE) serves as a case study for this research. Members of the administrative team, researchers, postdoctoral fellows, graduate research assistants, and others are asked about their experiences collaborating within INKE on an annual basis in order to understand the nature of collaboration and ways that it may change over the life of a long-term grant. Interviewees continue to outline benefits for collaboration within INKE while admitting that there continue to be challenges. They also outline several lessons learned which will be applied to the next project.","PeriodicalId":425221,"journal":{"name":"KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/KULA.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many academic teams and granting agencies undergo a process of reflection at the completion of research projects to understand lessons learned and develop best practice guidelines. Generally completed at the project’s end, these reviews focus on the actual research work accomplished with little discussion of the work relationships and process involved. As a result, some hard-earned lessons are forgotten or minimized through the passage of time. Additional learning about the nature of collaboration may be gained if this type of reflection occurs during the project’s life. Building on earlier examinations of INKE, this paper contributes to that discussion with an exploration of seventh and final year of a large-scale research project.Implementing New Knowledge Environment (INKE) serves as a case study for this research. Members of the administrative team, researchers, postdoctoral fellows, graduate research assistants, and others are asked about their experiences collaborating within INKE on an annual basis in order to understand the nature of collaboration and ways that it may change over the life of a long-term grant. Interviewees continue to outline benefits for collaboration within INKE while admitting that there continue to be challenges. They also outline several lessons learned which will be applied to the next project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展开放的社会奖学金合作:映客的经验
许多学术团队和资助机构在研究项目完成后都会进行反思,以了解经验教训并制定最佳实践指南。通常在项目结束时完成,这些审查侧重于实际完成的研究工作,很少讨论工作关系和所涉及的过程。结果,随着时间的推移,一些来之不易的教训被遗忘或最小化。如果这种类型的反思发生在项目的生命周期中,则可以获得关于协作本质的额外学习。在对映客早期研究的基础上,本文通过对一个大型研究项目的第七年和最后一年的探索,为这一讨论做出了贡献。本研究以实施新知识环境(INKE)为例。管理团队成员、研究人员、博士后、研究生研究助理和其他人员每年都会被问及他们在映客内部合作的经历,以了解合作的本质以及在长期资助的生命周期内合作的方式可能发生的变化。受访者继续概述了映客内部合作的好处,同时承认仍然存在挑战。他们还概述了一些经验教训,这些经验教训将应用于下一个项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LIS Journals’ Lack of Participation in Wikidata Item Creation Using Linked Data Sources to Enhance Catalog Discovery Leveraging Wikidata to Build Scholarly Profiles as Service Re-purposing Excavation Database Content as Paradata South Asian Canadian Digital Archive Thesaurus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1