{"title":"Public-private partnerships to solve the skills gap?","authors":"P. Moerman","doi":"10.53807/0501alt6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the issue of the ‘skills gap’ and the possibility for governments to stimulate collaborative partnerships between educational institutions and businesses (‘public-private partnerships’) to reduce this gap. The Dutch government initialized several such initiatives to realize regional public-private partnerships in vocational and higher education (Ministry of Education, 2017; Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2018), but also within the private sector alone, to stimulate cooperation to bridge the skills gap. The government implemented an incentive to build partnerships with much freedom to set goals and activities and to focus on experimentation and learning, with the requirement of co-funding and shared goals among partners. Partnerships might be able to achieve results that colleges or companies could never hope to attain alone (‘the whole is greater than the sum of the parts’). Based on an analysis of 48 partnerships up until 2017, this appears to be true: partnerships can engage in a large variety of activities that each partner alone would not have accomplished; and can reflect and adapt based on their progress. However, the power relationship within the partnerships appears to have a strong tendency to lean towards the education institution, leading to goal displacement regarding their primary goal and the termination of activities that are perceived as difficult by the education institution, in the Netherlands most notably lifelong learning. This causes concern about the likelihood of involvement of (smaller) companies in the long term. The position of the less powerful partners (often small-and medium sized companies) needs to be strengthened for them to continue to participate, focusing on activities that benefit these partners, such as lifelong learning.","PeriodicalId":133479,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of University Lifelong Learning","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of University Lifelong Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53807/0501alt6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article focuses on the issue of the ‘skills gap’ and the possibility for governments to stimulate collaborative partnerships between educational institutions and businesses (‘public-private partnerships’) to reduce this gap. The Dutch government initialized several such initiatives to realize regional public-private partnerships in vocational and higher education (Ministry of Education, 2017; Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2018), but also within the private sector alone, to stimulate cooperation to bridge the skills gap. The government implemented an incentive to build partnerships with much freedom to set goals and activities and to focus on experimentation and learning, with the requirement of co-funding and shared goals among partners. Partnerships might be able to achieve results that colleges or companies could never hope to attain alone (‘the whole is greater than the sum of the parts’). Based on an analysis of 48 partnerships up until 2017, this appears to be true: partnerships can engage in a large variety of activities that each partner alone would not have accomplished; and can reflect and adapt based on their progress. However, the power relationship within the partnerships appears to have a strong tendency to lean towards the education institution, leading to goal displacement regarding their primary goal and the termination of activities that are perceived as difficult by the education institution, in the Netherlands most notably lifelong learning. This causes concern about the likelihood of involvement of (smaller) companies in the long term. The position of the less powerful partners (often small-and medium sized companies) needs to be strengthened for them to continue to participate, focusing on activities that benefit these partners, such as lifelong learning.
本文重点关注“技能差距”问题,以及政府刺激教育机构和企业之间的合作伙伴关系(“公私伙伴关系”)以缩小这一差距的可能性。荷兰政府发起了几项这样的倡议,以实现职业和高等教育的区域公私伙伴关系(Ministry of education, 2017;经济部,2018年),但也仅限于私营部门,以刺激合作,弥合技能差距。政府实施了一项激励措施,鼓励建立伙伴关系,在设定目标和活动方面有很大的自由,并将重点放在实验和学习上,同时要求合作伙伴共同出资,共同实现目标。合作可能会取得大学或公司永远无法企及的成果(“整体大于部分之和”)。根据对截至2017年的48个伙伴关系的分析,这似乎是正确的:伙伴关系可以参与各种各样的活动,这些活动是每个伙伴单独完成不了的;并能根据自己的进步进行反思和调整。然而,伙伴关系中的权力关系似乎有向教育机构倾斜的强烈趋势,导致其主要目标的目标位移,以及教育机构认为困难的活动的终止,在荷兰最明显的是终身学习。这引起了人们对(较小)公司长期参与的可能性的担忧。需要加强实力较弱的伙伴(通常是中小型公司)的地位,使它们能够继续参与,重点关注有利于这些伙伴的活动,例如终身学习。