Evaluation of error and efficiency on tree height measurement using Abney’s level, Rangefinder and Vertex IV

Suchana Aryal, P. Paudel, S. Bolakhe, Deepak Mahatara, Prakash Lamichane
{"title":"Evaluation of error and efficiency on tree height measurement using Abney’s level, Rangefinder and Vertex IV","authors":"Suchana Aryal, P. Paudel, S. Bolakhe, Deepak Mahatara, Prakash Lamichane","doi":"10.54207/bsmps1000-2022-49p4f8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tree height is one of the basic variables which is used for estimation of growing stock, biomass, carbon stock and site quality. Measuring tree height is expensive, time-consuming, and error prone due to stand structure and efficiency of measuring instruments. Here, we try to explore the errors and efficiencies associated with Vertex, Abney’s level, and Laser Rangefinder for tree height measurement. Standing tree height was measured using all three instruments and the true height was determined with the careful measurement using linear tape after felling. In total 102 trees of Arunkhola community forest of Nawalpur districts were sampled. It was found that the Vertex (0.55 m) and Abney’s level (2.36 m) overestimated the tree height whereas, Rangefinder (-1.65 m) was underestimating. There was significant difference in errors for all the evaluated instruments at 95% confidence interval. However, there was no relation between true height and DBH with difference in measurement for all instruments. Average time required to measure individual trees was 4.15, 2.29 and 0.93 minutes for Abney’s level, Rangefinder, and Vertex respectively. It was estimated that efficiency for Vertex was 4.46 followed by Rangefinder with 22.69 by reflecting Vertex as the most precise and efficient instrument for measuring tree height.","PeriodicalId":142181,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Forestry","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2022-49p4f8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tree height is one of the basic variables which is used for estimation of growing stock, biomass, carbon stock and site quality. Measuring tree height is expensive, time-consuming, and error prone due to stand structure and efficiency of measuring instruments. Here, we try to explore the errors and efficiencies associated with Vertex, Abney’s level, and Laser Rangefinder for tree height measurement. Standing tree height was measured using all three instruments and the true height was determined with the careful measurement using linear tape after felling. In total 102 trees of Arunkhola community forest of Nawalpur districts were sampled. It was found that the Vertex (0.55 m) and Abney’s level (2.36 m) overestimated the tree height whereas, Rangefinder (-1.65 m) was underestimating. There was significant difference in errors for all the evaluated instruments at 95% confidence interval. However, there was no relation between true height and DBH with difference in measurement for all instruments. Average time required to measure individual trees was 4.15, 2.29 and 0.93 minutes for Abney’s level, Rangefinder, and Vertex respectively. It was estimated that efficiency for Vertex was 4.46 followed by Rangefinder with 22.69 by reflecting Vertex as the most precise and efficient instrument for measuring tree height.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Abney的水平仪、测距仪和Vertex IV测量树高的误差和效率评估
树高是估算生长蓄积量、生物量、碳储量和立地质量的基本变量之一。由于林分结构和测量仪器的效率,测量树木高度既昂贵又耗时,而且容易出错。在这里,我们尝试探索与顶点,Abney的水平和激光测距仪的树木高度测量相关的误差和效率。用这三种仪器测量树木的直立高度,并在砍伐后用线性卷尺仔细测量树木的真实高度。对纳瓦尔布尔地区Arunkhola社区森林的102棵树进行了取样。Vertex (0.55 m)和Abney’s level (2.36 m)高估了树高,而Rangefinder (-1.65 m)低估了树高。在95%置信区间内,所有评估仪器的误差有显著差异。但各仪器测量结果差异,真实高度与胸径之间无相关性。对于Abney的水平仪、Rangefinder和Vertex,测量单个树木所需的平均时间分别为4.15分钟、2.29分钟和0.93分钟。结果表明,Vertex的效率为4.46,Rangefinder的效率为22.69,是测量树木高度最精确、最有效的仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A preliminary assessment of bryophyte diversity in some alpine areas of East Sikkim, India An updated checklist of the vascular flora of Asan Conservation Reserve, Uttarakhand, India Potential AM inoculants for enhanced growth performance and seedling survival in Nahar (Mesua ferrea) seedlings New distributional record of Piper retrofractum (Piperaceae) from West Bengal, India: A taxonomic note Distributional note on Boerhavia erecta (Nyctaginaceae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1