Building a Foundation to Measure National Well-Being

Andrew Gerin, Ben Clougherty, Jack Chang, Kal Fernlund, K. Macdonald, Rakshith Raghu, Thomas L. Sample, A. Rashap, S. Guerlain
{"title":"Building a Foundation to Measure National Well-Being","authors":"Andrew Gerin, Ben Clougherty, Jack Chang, Kal Fernlund, K. Macdonald, Rakshith Raghu, Thomas L. Sample, A. Rashap, S. Guerlain","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Key National Indicators Act of 2008 was passed by the United States Congress with the intent of creating a system of citizen-based statistics, which would function as a tool for informing both policymakers and the American public on the current outlook of our nation with respect to the physical, financial, and social well-being of individuals. This act allocated $77.5 million over a 10-year period to establish a commission that would collect and analyze data. However, over the past decade, the commission has failed to produce tangible results in the form of standardized metrics. Our research intends to carry out the initial goal of the Key National Indicators Act by following the basic principles proposed within it. To do so, we have used the five pillars of the US Constitution (Justice, Tranquility, Defense, Welfare, and Liberty) as broad indicators of how to measure progress. Within each pillar, specific metrics such as Poverty Rate (Welfare) and Recidivism Rate (Justice) were deemed significant through survey results. Data were assembled for each metric and weighted according to survey findings. After normalizing the results, sub-scores were established for each pillar and combined into an overall wellness score, the Promise America Wellness Score (PAWS). An analysis was carried out for data acquired from 1995 up until 2016 in order to understand the growth and decline of the United States over time. To effectively visualize and report these findings, a final product was designed in the form of a website. Through this website, the metrics and trends are made visible and interpretable, and are more easily marketed as a potentially valuable source of data for decision-makers. The website also includes areas for future steps in which well-being in the US would be able to be compared to well-being in other countries.","PeriodicalId":265421,"journal":{"name":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Key National Indicators Act of 2008 was passed by the United States Congress with the intent of creating a system of citizen-based statistics, which would function as a tool for informing both policymakers and the American public on the current outlook of our nation with respect to the physical, financial, and social well-being of individuals. This act allocated $77.5 million over a 10-year period to establish a commission that would collect and analyze data. However, over the past decade, the commission has failed to produce tangible results in the form of standardized metrics. Our research intends to carry out the initial goal of the Key National Indicators Act by following the basic principles proposed within it. To do so, we have used the five pillars of the US Constitution (Justice, Tranquility, Defense, Welfare, and Liberty) as broad indicators of how to measure progress. Within each pillar, specific metrics such as Poverty Rate (Welfare) and Recidivism Rate (Justice) were deemed significant through survey results. Data were assembled for each metric and weighted according to survey findings. After normalizing the results, sub-scores were established for each pillar and combined into an overall wellness score, the Promise America Wellness Score (PAWS). An analysis was carried out for data acquired from 1995 up until 2016 in order to understand the growth and decline of the United States over time. To effectively visualize and report these findings, a final product was designed in the form of a website. Through this website, the metrics and trends are made visible and interpretable, and are more easily marketed as a potentially valuable source of data for decision-makers. The website also includes areas for future steps in which well-being in the US would be able to be compared to well-being in other countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立衡量国民福祉的基础
2008年美国国会通过了《关键国家指标法案》,旨在建立一个以公民为基础的统计系统,作为一种工具,向政策制定者和美国公众通报我们国家在个人身体、财务和社会福祉方面的当前前景。该法案在10年期间拨款7750万美元,建立一个收集和分析数据的委员会。然而,在过去十年中,该委员会未能以标准化指标的形式取得切实成果。我们的研究旨在通过遵循《关键国家指标法》中提出的基本原则来实现《关键国家指标法》的最初目标。为了做到这一点,我们使用了美国宪法的五大支柱(正义、安宁、国防、福利和自由)作为衡量进步的广泛指标。在每个支柱中,通过调查结果,贫困率(福利)和累犯率(司法)等具体指标被认为是重要的。为每个指标收集数据,并根据调查结果进行加权。在将结果标准化后,为每个支柱建立子分数,并将其合并为整体健康分数,即承诺美国健康分数(PAWS)。为了了解美国随着时间的推移的增长和下降,对1995年至2016年的数据进行了分析。为了有效地可视化和报告这些发现,最终产品以网站的形式设计。通过这个网站,指标和趋势变得可见和可解释,并且更容易作为决策者潜在的有价值的数据来源进行营销。该网站还包括未来可以采取的步骤,将美国的福祉与其他国家的福祉进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things in the Transformation of E-Business Sector Gamification of eHealth Interventions to Increase User Engagement and Reduce Attrition Modeling User Context from Smartphone Data for Recognition of Health Status Developing a data pipeline to improve accessibility and utilization of Charlottesville's Open Data Portal Deep Learning for Detecting Diseases in Gastrointestinal Biopsy Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1