A machine learning technique for predicting the productivity of practitioners from individually developed software projects

Cuauhtémoc López Martín, Arturo Chavoya-Pena, M. Meda-Campaña
{"title":"A machine learning technique for predicting the productivity of practitioners from individually developed software projects","authors":"Cuauhtémoc López Martín, Arturo Chavoya-Pena, M. Meda-Campaña","doi":"10.1109/SNPD.2014.6888690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Productivity management of software developers is a challenge in Information and Communication Technology. Predictions of productivity can be useful to determine corrective actions and to assist managers in evaluating improvement alternatives. Productivity prediction models have been based on statistical regressions, statistical time series, fuzzy logic, and machine learning. Goal: To propose a machine learning model termed general regression neural network (GRNN) for predicting the productivity of software practitioners. Hypothesis: Prediction accuracy of a GRNN is better than a statistical regression model when these two models are applied for predicting productivity of software practitioners who have individually developed their software projects. Method: A sample obtained from 396 software projects developed between the years 2005 and 2011 by 99 practitioners was used for training the models, whereas a sample of 60 projects developed by 15 practitioners in the first months of 2012 was used for testing the models. All projects were developed based upon a disciplined development process within a controlled environment. The accuracy of the GRNN was compared against that of a multiple regression model (MLR). The criteria for evaluating the accuracy of these two models were the Magnitude of Error Relative to the estimate and a t-paired statistical test. Results: Prediction accuracy of an GRNN was statistically better than that of an MLR model at the 99% confidence level. Conclusion: An GRNN could be applied for predicting the productivity of practitioners when New and Changed lines of code, reused code, and programming language experience of practitioners are used as independent variables.","PeriodicalId":272932,"journal":{"name":"15th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"15th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2014.6888690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Context: Productivity management of software developers is a challenge in Information and Communication Technology. Predictions of productivity can be useful to determine corrective actions and to assist managers in evaluating improvement alternatives. Productivity prediction models have been based on statistical regressions, statistical time series, fuzzy logic, and machine learning. Goal: To propose a machine learning model termed general regression neural network (GRNN) for predicting the productivity of software practitioners. Hypothesis: Prediction accuracy of a GRNN is better than a statistical regression model when these two models are applied for predicting productivity of software practitioners who have individually developed their software projects. Method: A sample obtained from 396 software projects developed between the years 2005 and 2011 by 99 practitioners was used for training the models, whereas a sample of 60 projects developed by 15 practitioners in the first months of 2012 was used for testing the models. All projects were developed based upon a disciplined development process within a controlled environment. The accuracy of the GRNN was compared against that of a multiple regression model (MLR). The criteria for evaluating the accuracy of these two models were the Magnitude of Error Relative to the estimate and a t-paired statistical test. Results: Prediction accuracy of an GRNN was statistically better than that of an MLR model at the 99% confidence level. Conclusion: An GRNN could be applied for predicting the productivity of practitioners when New and Changed lines of code, reused code, and programming language experience of practitioners are used as independent variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种机器学习技术,用于从单独开发的软件项目中预测从业者的生产力
背景:软件开发人员的生产力管理是信息和通信技术中的一个挑战。对生产率的预测对于确定纠正措施和帮助管理者评价改进方案是有用的。生产率预测模型基于统计回归、统计时间序列、模糊逻辑和机器学习。目标:提出一种称为通用回归神经网络(GRNN)的机器学习模型,用于预测软件从业者的生产力。假设:当应用GRNN和统计回归模型来预测单独开发软件项目的软件从业者的生产力时,GRNN的预测精度优于统计回归模型。方法:使用99名从业人员在2005 - 2011年间开发的396个软件项目样本对模型进行训练,而使用15名从业人员在2012年前几个月开发的60个项目样本对模型进行测试。所有的项目都是在一个受控的环境中基于一个有纪律的开发过程开发的。将GRNN与多元回归模型(MLR)的准确率进行了比较。评估这两个模型准确性的标准是相对于估计值的误差幅度和t配对统计检验。结果:在99%的置信水平下,GRNN的预测精度在统计学上优于MLR模型。结论:GRNN可以应用于预测从业者的生产力,当新的和改变的代码行,重用的代码,和从业者的编程语言经验作为独立变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Leaving-bed Detection System to Prevent Midnight Prowl A source code plagiarism detecting method using alignment with abstract syntax tree elements Converting PCAPs into Weka mineable data Development of input assistance application for mobile devices for physically disabled Big data in memory: Benchimarking in memory database using the distributed key-value store for machine to machine communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1