When, If Ever, Can Restrictions on Free Movement Be Justified on Economic Grounds?

Peter Oliver
{"title":"When, If Ever, Can Restrictions on Free Movement Be Justified on Economic Grounds?","authors":"Peter Oliver","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2782389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a seminal ruling of 1961, the Court held that what is now Article 36 TFEU is directed only to “eventualities of a non-economic kind”. The basis for this principle, which governs all four freedoms, is simple: if restrictions were generally permitted on economic grounds, the internal market would be wholly undermined. Although this principle has been slightly eroded over recent decades as the four freedoms have been applied to increasingly sensitive sectors, the only clearly established, consistent and unambiguous departure from it relates to health care. In other fields, particularly social law, the case law is bedevilled with ambiguity and contradictions, no doubt because the Court is fully aware of the continuing central importance of the principle.","PeriodicalId":401648,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","volume":"257 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2782389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In a seminal ruling of 1961, the Court held that what is now Article 36 TFEU is directed only to “eventualities of a non-economic kind”. The basis for this principle, which governs all four freedoms, is simple: if restrictions were generally permitted on economic grounds, the internal market would be wholly undermined. Although this principle has been slightly eroded over recent decades as the four freedoms have been applied to increasingly sensitive sectors, the only clearly established, consistent and unambiguous departure from it relates to health care. In other fields, particularly social law, the case law is bedevilled with ambiguity and contradictions, no doubt because the Court is fully aware of the continuing central importance of the principle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么时候,如果有的话,对自由流动的限制能以经济理由为理由?
在1961年的一项具有开创性的裁决中,法院认为,现在的第36条TFEU仅针对“非经济类型的可能性”。这一原则支配着所有四项自由,其基础很简单:如果基于经济理由普遍允许限制,那么内部市场将被彻底破坏。近几十年来,随着四项自由适用于日益敏感的部门,这一原则略有削弱,但唯一明确确立、一贯和毫不含糊地背离这一原则的是保健。在其他领域,特别是在社会法方面,判例法充满了歧义和矛盾,这无疑是因为法院充分意识到这一原则仍然具有中心重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The European Parliament and Brexit Commission v Poland C-562/19 P: Turnover Taxation and State Aid Law Brexit and the Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement The EU Protection of Tax Data Transferred to Third Countries 'Re-Constituting' the Internal Market: Towards a Common Law of International Trade?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1