Reservoir Fluid Typing from Standard Mud Gas - A Machine Learning Approach

A. Cely, Artur Siedlecki, A. Liashenko, Tao Yang, S. Donnadieu
{"title":"Reservoir Fluid Typing from Standard Mud Gas - A Machine Learning Approach","authors":"A. Cely, Artur Siedlecki, A. Liashenko, Tao Yang, S. Donnadieu","doi":"10.2118/214341-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Standard mud gas data is part of the basic mudlogging service and is used mainly for safety monitoring. Although the data is available for all wells, it is not used for reservoir fluid typing due to poor prediction accuracy. We recently developed a new manual method and significantly improved the reservoir fluid typing accuracy from standard mud gas data. However, there is a strong business for an automatic method to enable reservoir fluid interpretation while drilling.\n A machine learning method has been developed based on a well-established standard mud gas database. The standard mud gas compositions contain methane, ethane, and propane components with reasonable quality measurements. The butane and pentane compositions in the standard mud gas are low and sometimes close to the detection limit. Therefore, we only use methane to propane compositions in the machine learning algorithm. It is particularly challenging to predict reservoir fluid type accurately based on only three gas components. Therefore, we introduce additional data sources to increase the prediction accuracy: a large in-house reservoir fluid database and petrophysical logs.\n The machine learning algorithm extracts critical reservoir fluid information specifically for a known field by utilizing the geospatial location and the existing reservoir fluid database. When combined with the standard mud gas database, the reservoir fluid typing accuracy increased from 50-60% to nearly 80%. Petrophysical logs are the main tool in the industry to identify the reservoir fluid type. When combining the petrophysical logs with the machine learning model already with satisfactory performance, the final reservoir fluid type prediction accuracy is about 80%. Given the difficulties of distinguishing oil or gas for near-critical fluids or volatile oil, the current prediction accuracy is sufficient for industry applications.\n The innovation created significant business opportunities based on the standard mud gas, which has been regarded as not applicable data for accurate reservoir fluid typing for many decades. The new method makes accurate reservoir fluid typing possible for real-time well decisions like well placement, completion, and sidetracking. In addition, the new method can add lots of value for well integrity, maturating production targets, and cost-efficient Plug and Abandonment (P&A) in the overburden.","PeriodicalId":306106,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214341-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard mud gas data is part of the basic mudlogging service and is used mainly for safety monitoring. Although the data is available for all wells, it is not used for reservoir fluid typing due to poor prediction accuracy. We recently developed a new manual method and significantly improved the reservoir fluid typing accuracy from standard mud gas data. However, there is a strong business for an automatic method to enable reservoir fluid interpretation while drilling. A machine learning method has been developed based on a well-established standard mud gas database. The standard mud gas compositions contain methane, ethane, and propane components with reasonable quality measurements. The butane and pentane compositions in the standard mud gas are low and sometimes close to the detection limit. Therefore, we only use methane to propane compositions in the machine learning algorithm. It is particularly challenging to predict reservoir fluid type accurately based on only three gas components. Therefore, we introduce additional data sources to increase the prediction accuracy: a large in-house reservoir fluid database and petrophysical logs. The machine learning algorithm extracts critical reservoir fluid information specifically for a known field by utilizing the geospatial location and the existing reservoir fluid database. When combined with the standard mud gas database, the reservoir fluid typing accuracy increased from 50-60% to nearly 80%. Petrophysical logs are the main tool in the industry to identify the reservoir fluid type. When combining the petrophysical logs with the machine learning model already with satisfactory performance, the final reservoir fluid type prediction accuracy is about 80%. Given the difficulties of distinguishing oil or gas for near-critical fluids or volatile oil, the current prediction accuracy is sufficient for industry applications. The innovation created significant business opportunities based on the standard mud gas, which has been regarded as not applicable data for accurate reservoir fluid typing for many decades. The new method makes accurate reservoir fluid typing possible for real-time well decisions like well placement, completion, and sidetracking. In addition, the new method can add lots of value for well integrity, maturating production targets, and cost-efficient Plug and Abandonment (P&A) in the overburden.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从标准泥浆气体中分型油藏流体——一种机器学习方法
标准泥浆气数据是基本泥浆测井服务的一部分,主要用于安全监测。虽然所有井的数据都可用,但由于预测精度较差,它不能用于储层流体类型。我们最近开发了一种新的人工方法,显著提高了根据标准泥浆气数据进行储层流体分型的准确性。然而,在钻井过程中实现储层流体解释的自动方法具有很强的业务潜力。基于一个完善的标准泥浆气数据库,开发了一种机器学习方法。标准泥浆气体成分含有甲烷、乙烷和丙烷成分,具有合理的质量测量。标准泥浆气中的丁烷和戊烷成分较低,有时接近检出限。因此,我们在机器学习算法中只使用甲烷来丙烷成分。仅根据三种气体组分准确预测储层流体类型尤其具有挑战性。因此,我们引入了额外的数据源来提高预测精度:一个大型的内部储层流体数据库和岩石物理测井。机器学习算法利用地理空间位置和现有储层流体数据库提取已知油田的关键储层流体信息。当与标准泥浆气数据库结合使用时,储层流体类型的准确率从50-60%提高到近80%。岩石物理测井是业内识别储层流体类型的主要工具。将岩石物理测井资料与机器学习模型相结合,最终的储层流体类型预测精度可达80%左右。考虑到在近临界流体或挥发油中区分油或气的困难,目前的预测精度足以用于工业应用。这项创新创造了基于标准泥浆气体的重大商机,几十年来,标准泥浆气体一直被认为不适用准确的油藏流体类型数据。新方法使准确的储层流体类型成为可能,可以实时做出井位、完井和侧钻等井决策。此外,这种新方法可以为井的完整性、成熟生产目标和经济高效的上覆层封井弃井(P&A)增加很多价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization of Microfluidics Technology for an Efficient Polymer Screening Process in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Applications Decarbonization Will Not Come for Free: Asset-M Marginal Abatement Cost Curve Comparing WAG-CO2 Injection with Continuous Water and Gas Injection in Separate Wells for the Development and Management of a CO2-Rich Light Oil Fractured Carbonate Reservoir Subject to Full Gas Recycling ESG, Sustainability and Decarbonization: An Analysis of Strategies and Solutions for the Energy Industry Feasibility Evaluation of Warm Solvent Assisted Gravity Drainage Process in Low-Carbon Developing Super-Heavy Oil or Oil Sands Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1