Optimizing EUV imaging metrics as a function of absorber thickness and illumination source: simulation case study of Ta-Co alloy

D. Thakare, A. Delabie, V. Philipsen
{"title":"Optimizing EUV imaging metrics as a function of absorber thickness and illumination source: simulation case study of Ta-Co alloy","authors":"D. Thakare, A. Delabie, V. Philipsen","doi":"10.1117/12.2640098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The imaging performance of a mask in EUV lithography is governed by the optical properties of the absorber material, namely the refractive index n and extinction coefficient k, and by its thickness. The imaging metrics viz. Normalized Intensity Log Slope (NILS), Telecentricity Error (TCE) and Best Focus Variation (BFV) through pitch, exhibit a tradeoff. In addition, the choice of illumination has a significant influence on these imaging metrics. Most of the previous studies have focused on either reflectivity or phase shift induced by the absorber to determine the optimum absorber thickness. The limitation of this approach is that the structure of the patterns on the mask is ignored. This simulation study is intended to facilitate the selection of the optimum absorber thickness with an emphasis on diffraction order analysis and the impact of illumination source shape using a case study of TaCo alloy. The behavior of imaging metrics is investigated as a function of absorber thickness in combination with illumination source shapes recommended in the literature. Maximal NILS, TCE within specified limits, balancing of diffraction order amplitudes with a minimum phase difference, and throughput criterion, are the important parameters that are considered when selecting the optimum absorber thickness. We evaluate and compare the through pitch imaging performance of TaCo alloy with recommended thicknesses, to that of the reference TaBN 60 nm absorber using Leaf shape Dipole (LDP), Inner Half Leaf shape Dipole (IHLDP) and Outer Half Leaf shape Dipole (OHLDP) for Line and Space (LnS) pattern with trench width of 10nm and the smallest pitch of 20 nm. The study confirms that TaCo alloy exhibits improved NILS and lower BFV compared to the reference TaBN 60 nm absorber.","PeriodicalId":287066,"journal":{"name":"European Mask and Lithography Conference","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Mask and Lithography Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2640098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The imaging performance of a mask in EUV lithography is governed by the optical properties of the absorber material, namely the refractive index n and extinction coefficient k, and by its thickness. The imaging metrics viz. Normalized Intensity Log Slope (NILS), Telecentricity Error (TCE) and Best Focus Variation (BFV) through pitch, exhibit a tradeoff. In addition, the choice of illumination has a significant influence on these imaging metrics. Most of the previous studies have focused on either reflectivity or phase shift induced by the absorber to determine the optimum absorber thickness. The limitation of this approach is that the structure of the patterns on the mask is ignored. This simulation study is intended to facilitate the selection of the optimum absorber thickness with an emphasis on diffraction order analysis and the impact of illumination source shape using a case study of TaCo alloy. The behavior of imaging metrics is investigated as a function of absorber thickness in combination with illumination source shapes recommended in the literature. Maximal NILS, TCE within specified limits, balancing of diffraction order amplitudes with a minimum phase difference, and throughput criterion, are the important parameters that are considered when selecting the optimum absorber thickness. We evaluate and compare the through pitch imaging performance of TaCo alloy with recommended thicknesses, to that of the reference TaBN 60 nm absorber using Leaf shape Dipole (LDP), Inner Half Leaf shape Dipole (IHLDP) and Outer Half Leaf shape Dipole (OHLDP) for Line and Space (LnS) pattern with trench width of 10nm and the smallest pitch of 20 nm. The study confirms that TaCo alloy exhibits improved NILS and lower BFV compared to the reference TaBN 60 nm absorber.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以吸收体厚度和光源为函数优化EUV成像指标:Ta-Co合金的模拟案例研究
在EUV光刻中,掩模的成像性能取决于吸收材料的光学特性,即折射率n和消光系数k,以及它的厚度。成像指标,即归一化强度对数斜率(NILS),远心误差(TCE)和最佳聚焦变化(BFV)通过螺距,表现出一种权衡。此外,照明的选择对这些成像指标有显著的影响。以往的研究大多集中在吸收剂的反射率或相移上,以确定吸收剂的最佳厚度。这种方法的局限性是忽略了掩模上图案的结构。本仿真研究以TaCo合金为例,重点分析了衍射阶分析和光源形状的影响,旨在促进最佳吸收层厚度的选择。成像指标的行为被研究作为一个函数吸收剂厚度结合照明光源形状在文献中推荐。最大NILS、限定范围内的TCE、最小相位差下衍射阶幅值的平衡以及通量准则是选择最佳吸收剂厚度时需要考虑的重要参数。我们评估并比较了推荐厚度的TaCo合金与参考材料TaBN 60 nm吸收剂在线和空间(LnS)模式下的透距成像性能,分别使用叶形偶极子(LDP)、内半叶形偶极子(IHLDP)和外半叶形偶极子(OHLDP),槽宽为10nm,最小间距为20 nm。研究证实,与参考TaBN 60 nm吸收剂相比,TaCo合金具有更好的NILS和更低的BFV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synergy between quantum computing and semiconductor technology New registration calibration strategies for MBMW tools by PROVE measurements OPC flow for non-conventional layouts: specific application to optical diffusers Lithographic performance of resist ma-N 1402 in an e-beam/i-line stepper intra-level mix and match approach High-precision optical constant characterization of materials in the EUV spectral range: from large research facilities to laboratory-based instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1