Risk-based access control at Mount Isa Copper Operations

G. Potgieter, A. Grubb
{"title":"Risk-based access control at Mount Isa Copper Operations","authors":"G. Potgieter, A. Grubb","doi":"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_0.4_POTGIETER","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mount Isa Copper Operations (MICO) is one of the oldest and deepest mines in Australia, comprising the largest underground network of mine development in the world. During the early operational years, ground support, particularly surface support, was not routinely installed. Although rehabilitation in recent years has drastically reduced the amount of tunnel without support, there remain tens of kilometres of excavation with limited to no ground support installed. In addition, older development was often mined within close proximity to unfilled or partially filled stopes and vertical openings. The voids pre-date modern 3D mine plans and scanning technology. Furthermore, access to the voids to conduct scans is limited, this results in an imperfect understanding of the void sizes and proximity to accessible drives. The lack of ground support and knowledge of void status poses significant ground failure risks at MICO. \nA significant increase in rock related near-hit incidents occurred during the second half of 2014 and the first half of 2015. A number of these incidents had the potential to cause severe or fatal harm. The incidents triggered internal investigations that aimed at understanding and reducing the ground failure risk. The outcome of the investigations was the creation of a series of interlinked systems, namely the tunnel condition risk assessment (TCRA), mine closure areas (MCA), ground awareness training (GAT), vertical opening pillar hazard assessment and control (VOPHAC), stope void review (SVR), manual scaling crews, fall of ground database and the quality assurance/quality control management plan (QA/QC MP). The individual components of the system are specialised and simple. However, the system is comprehensive and robust. Each of the components, as well as how they interlink, is discussed within this paper. \nThe interlinked systems and practices provide controls and have proven to be effective at reducing the ground failure risks. Although the systems were developed at MICO, they have the potential to be easily adapted and utilised at other mine sites.","PeriodicalId":337751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_0.4_POTGIETER","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mount Isa Copper Operations (MICO) is one of the oldest and deepest mines in Australia, comprising the largest underground network of mine development in the world. During the early operational years, ground support, particularly surface support, was not routinely installed. Although rehabilitation in recent years has drastically reduced the amount of tunnel without support, there remain tens of kilometres of excavation with limited to no ground support installed. In addition, older development was often mined within close proximity to unfilled or partially filled stopes and vertical openings. The voids pre-date modern 3D mine plans and scanning technology. Furthermore, access to the voids to conduct scans is limited, this results in an imperfect understanding of the void sizes and proximity to accessible drives. The lack of ground support and knowledge of void status poses significant ground failure risks at MICO. A significant increase in rock related near-hit incidents occurred during the second half of 2014 and the first half of 2015. A number of these incidents had the potential to cause severe or fatal harm. The incidents triggered internal investigations that aimed at understanding and reducing the ground failure risk. The outcome of the investigations was the creation of a series of interlinked systems, namely the tunnel condition risk assessment (TCRA), mine closure areas (MCA), ground awareness training (GAT), vertical opening pillar hazard assessment and control (VOPHAC), stope void review (SVR), manual scaling crews, fall of ground database and the quality assurance/quality control management plan (QA/QC MP). The individual components of the system are specialised and simple. However, the system is comprehensive and robust. Each of the components, as well as how they interlink, is discussed within this paper. The interlinked systems and practices provide controls and have proven to be effective at reducing the ground failure risks. Although the systems were developed at MICO, they have the potential to be easily adapted and utilised at other mine sites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以风险为基础的访问控制
伊萨铜矿(MICO)是澳大利亚最古老、最深的矿山之一,拥有世界上最大的地下矿山开发网络。在作战初期,地面支援,特别是地面支援,并没有常规安装。虽然近年来的修复工程大大减少了没有支护的隧道数量,但仍有数十公里的挖掘工程没有安装地面支护。此外,较老的开发项目通常在靠近未充填或部分充填的采场和垂直开口的地方开采。这些空洞早于现代三维矿山规划和扫描技术。此外,进入孔洞进行扫描的途径有限,这导致对孔洞大小和可访问驱动器的接近程度的了解不完善。由于缺乏地面支持和对空洞状态的了解,MICO存在严重的地面故障风险。在2014年下半年和2015年上半年,与岩石相关的近撞事故显著增加。其中一些事件有可能造成严重或致命的伤害。这些事件引发了内部调查,旨在了解和降低地面故障风险。调查的结果是建立了一系列相互关联的系统,即隧道状况风险评估(TCRA)、矿井闭坑区(MCA)、地面意识培训(GAT)、垂直开孔矿柱危害评估和控制(VOPHAC)、采场空洞审查(SVR)、人工定标人员、地面下降数据库和质量保证/质量控制管理计划(QA/QC MP)。该系统的各个组件都是专门的和简单的。然而,该系统是全面的和健壮的。本文讨论了每个组件以及它们如何相互连接。相互连接的系统和实践提供了控制,并已被证明在减少地面故障风险方面是有效的。虽然这些系统是在MICO开发的,但它们有可能很容易在其他矿场加以调整和利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geotechnical risk-informed decision-making in mining Using qualitative risk assessment as a leading indicator for geotechnical risk in mining Construction of a damage risk model for footwall drifts Quantifying uncertainty in mining geomechanics design Development of the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1