The Effect of Output-based Task Repetition on EFL Learners’ Speech Act Production

Hossein Ahmadi, F. Ghaemi, P. Birjandi
{"title":"The Effect of Output-based Task Repetition on EFL Learners’ Speech Act Production","authors":"Hossein Ahmadi, F. Ghaemi, P. Birjandi","doi":"10.29252/IJAL.19.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effects of different output-based task repetition conditions on EFL learners’ speech act production. Three intact classes of English-major students constituted three instructional groups: (1) the explicit task-repetition (ETR) group, (2) the implicit task-repetition (ITR) group, and (3) the no-input task repetition (NTR) group. All the three groups engaged in the repetition of outputgeneration tasks. However, before the second performance of the task, the ETR group received input coupled with metapragmatic information, the ITR group received visually enhanced input coupled with a consciousness raising task, and the NTR group received no input. The results of a written discourse completion test (WDCT) revealed statistically significant gains in the learners’ performance from the pretest to the posttest in the ETR and ITR groups, but not in the NTR group. Moreover, the analysis of differences across the groups in the posttest revealed the superiority of the ETR over the ITR and NTR groups. The results suggest that output-based task repetition cannot enhance EFL learners’ speech act production ability unless learners are provided with input before the second performance of the task. Also when explicit and implicit instructional methods are integrated with output-based task repetition, the explicit approach is more effective than its implicit counterpart.","PeriodicalId":179721,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/IJAL.19.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different output-based task repetition conditions on EFL learners’ speech act production. Three intact classes of English-major students constituted three instructional groups: (1) the explicit task-repetition (ETR) group, (2) the implicit task-repetition (ITR) group, and (3) the no-input task repetition (NTR) group. All the three groups engaged in the repetition of outputgeneration tasks. However, before the second performance of the task, the ETR group received input coupled with metapragmatic information, the ITR group received visually enhanced input coupled with a consciousness raising task, and the NTR group received no input. The results of a written discourse completion test (WDCT) revealed statistically significant gains in the learners’ performance from the pretest to the posttest in the ETR and ITR groups, but not in the NTR group. Moreover, the analysis of differences across the groups in the posttest revealed the superiority of the ETR over the ITR and NTR groups. The results suggest that output-based task repetition cannot enhance EFL learners’ speech act production ability unless learners are provided with input before the second performance of the task. Also when explicit and implicit instructional methods are integrated with output-based task repetition, the explicit approach is more effective than its implicit counterpart.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于输出的任务重复对英语学习者言语行为产生的影响
本研究探讨了不同基于输出的任务重复条件对英语学习者言语行为产生的影响。三个完整的英语专业学生班级组成了三个教学组:(1)外显任务重复组(ETR)、(2)内隐任务重复组(ITR)和(3)无输入任务重复组(NTR)。所有三组都参与了输出生成任务的重复。然而,在第二次执行任务之前,ETR组接受了附带元语用信息的输入,ITR组接受了附带意识提升任务的视觉增强输入,而NTR组没有接受任何输入。书面话语完成测试(WDCT)的结果显示,在ETR组和ITR组中,学习者的表现从测试前到测试后都有统计学上的显著提高,而在NTR组中则没有。此外,后测组间差异分析显示,ETR组优于ITR组和NTR组。结果表明,基于输出的任务重复不能提高学习者的言语行为产生能力,除非在第二次执行任务之前为学习者提供输入。此外,当外显和内隐教学方法与基于输出的任务重复相结合时,外显方法比内隐方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stepping into Mindful Education: A Teacher Educator’s Narrative of Contextualizing a SLTE Curriculum Measuring the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Instruction through Explicit and Implicit Measures Pre-service Language Teachers’ Cognitions about Language Learning/teaching and Cognition Refinements through a Reflection-oriented Practicum Investigating the Effect of the Training Program on Raters’ Oral Performance Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study on Raters’ Think-Aloud Verbal Protocols Organizational Patterns of English Language Teachers’ Repair Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1