Pisa: What Makes the Difference? Explaining the Gap in Pisa Test Scores between Finland and Germany

Andreas Ammermüller
{"title":"Pisa: What Makes the Difference? Explaining the Gap in Pisa Test Scores between Finland and Germany","authors":"Andreas Ammermüller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.555954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The huge difference in the level and variance of student performance in the 2000 PISA study between Finland and Germany motivates this paper. It analyses why Finnish students performed so much better by estimating educational production functions for both countries. The difference in the reading proficiency scores is assigned to different effects, using Oaxaca-Blinder and Juhn-Murphy-Pierce decomposition techniques. The analysis shows that German students have on average a more favorable background except for the lowest deciles, but experience much lower returns to these background characteristics in terms of test scores than Finnish students. The results imply that early streaming in Germany penalizes students in lower school types and leads to a greater inequality of educational achievement. It remains unclear, however, if this can be attributed to the effect of school types per se or student background and innate ability that determine the allocation process of students into school types. Overall, the variation in test scores can be explained much better by the observable characteristics in Germany than in Finland.","PeriodicalId":181797,"journal":{"name":"European Economics eJournal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.555954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

The huge difference in the level and variance of student performance in the 2000 PISA study between Finland and Germany motivates this paper. It analyses why Finnish students performed so much better by estimating educational production functions for both countries. The difference in the reading proficiency scores is assigned to different effects, using Oaxaca-Blinder and Juhn-Murphy-Pierce decomposition techniques. The analysis shows that German students have on average a more favorable background except for the lowest deciles, but experience much lower returns to these background characteristics in terms of test scores than Finnish students. The results imply that early streaming in Germany penalizes students in lower school types and leads to a greater inequality of educational achievement. It remains unclear, however, if this can be attributed to the effect of school types per se or student background and innate ability that determine the allocation process of students into school types. Overall, the variation in test scores can be explained much better by the observable characteristics in Germany than in Finland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比萨:是什么造成了不同?解释芬兰和德国在Pisa测试成绩上的差距
芬兰和德国在2000年PISA研究中学生表现水平和差异的巨大差异激发了本文的研究。它通过估算两国的教育生产函数,分析了为什么芬兰学生表现得如此之好。使用瓦哈卡-布林德和约翰-墨菲-皮尔斯分解技术,将阅读能力分数的差异分配给不同的效果。分析表明,除了分数最低的十分之一之外,德国学生的平均背景更有利,但就考试成绩而言,这些背景特征的回报要比芬兰学生低得多。研究结果表明,德国的早期分班教育惩罚了低年级的学生,并导致了更大的教育成就不平等。然而,目前尚不清楚这是否可以归因于学校类型本身的影响,还是学生的背景和天生能力决定了学生在学校类型中的分配过程。总的来说,德国的可观察特征比芬兰更好地解释了考试成绩的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Firm Heterogeneity and Endogenous Regional Disparities Economics of Transfer Pricing Reviewed The Irregular Economy in Systemic Transformation The Northern Dimension - One Pillar of the Bridge between Russia and the EU Russian Local Self-Government Today
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1