Predictors of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Emergency Ambulance Workers in Kelantan, Malaysia

Wan-Nor-Asyikeen Wan Adnan, Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman, Engku Ariff Tuan Lonik, Siti Azrin Ab Hamid
{"title":"Predictors of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Emergency Ambulance Workers in Kelantan, Malaysia","authors":"Wan-Nor-Asyikeen Wan Adnan, Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman, Engku Ariff Tuan Lonik, Siti Azrin Ab Hamid","doi":"10.5812/zjrms-120737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emergency medical professionals are often associated with poor psychological health, which undoubtedly affects their mental health as well as their work productivity. Objectives: The study aimed to determine the predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among emergency ambulance workers in Kelantan hospitals. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 143 emergency medical services (EMS) ambulance workers working at ten government hospitals in Kelantan. Assistant medical officers and nurses were also included in the study, while the respondents who had psychological problems before the study were excluded. Sociodemographic data were collected using a self-reported questionnaire. In contrast, the English version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale Version 21 (DASS-21) was used to assess the extent of depression, anxiety, and stress. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that predict depression, anxiety, and stress among ambulance workers. Results: The respondents ranged from 23 to 59 years old, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 38.27 (7.27). Half of the respondents were in the age group of 30 to 39 years (51.0%). Males numbered 91 (63.6%), and female workers numbered 52 (36.4%). The majority of respondents were married individuals (92.3%), non-smokers (79.0%), and had worked for more than ten years (37.7%). More than ten years of service in EMS was identified as a predictor for depression, anxiety, and stress; low back pain was identified as a predictor for anxiety, and female gender was identified as a predictor for stress. Conclusions: The hospital should pay more attention to the sources of depression, anxiety, and stress experienced by ambulance staff, which must be addressed appropriately.","PeriodicalId":292747,"journal":{"name":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-120737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency medical professionals are often associated with poor psychological health, which undoubtedly affects their mental health as well as their work productivity. Objectives: The study aimed to determine the predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among emergency ambulance workers in Kelantan hospitals. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 143 emergency medical services (EMS) ambulance workers working at ten government hospitals in Kelantan. Assistant medical officers and nurses were also included in the study, while the respondents who had psychological problems before the study were excluded. Sociodemographic data were collected using a self-reported questionnaire. In contrast, the English version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale Version 21 (DASS-21) was used to assess the extent of depression, anxiety, and stress. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that predict depression, anxiety, and stress among ambulance workers. Results: The respondents ranged from 23 to 59 years old, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 38.27 (7.27). Half of the respondents were in the age group of 30 to 39 years (51.0%). Males numbered 91 (63.6%), and female workers numbered 52 (36.4%). The majority of respondents were married individuals (92.3%), non-smokers (79.0%), and had worked for more than ten years (37.7%). More than ten years of service in EMS was identified as a predictor for depression, anxiety, and stress; low back pain was identified as a predictor for anxiety, and female gender was identified as a predictor for stress. Conclusions: The hospital should pay more attention to the sources of depression, anxiety, and stress experienced by ambulance staff, which must be addressed appropriately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁、焦虑和压力症状的预测因素:马来西亚吉兰丹州紧急救护人员的横断面研究
背景:急诊医务人员往往与心理健康状况不佳有关,这无疑会影响他们的心理健康和工作效率。目的:本研究旨在确定吉兰丹州医院急救人员的抑郁、焦虑和压力症状的预测因素。方法:本横断面研究包括在吉兰丹州10所政府医院工作的143名紧急医疗服务(EMS)救护人员。助理医务人员和护士也被纳入研究,而在研究之前有心理问题的受访者被排除在外。社会人口统计数据采用自我报告问卷收集。相比之下,使用英语版本的抑郁、焦虑和压力量表第21版(DASS-21)来评估抑郁、焦虑和压力的程度。采用Logistic回归分析确定预测救护人员抑郁、焦虑和压力的因素。结果:调查对象年龄在23 ~ 59岁之间,平均(标准差)年龄为38.27(7.27)岁。一半的受访者年龄在30 - 39岁之间(51.0%)。男性91人(63.6%),女性52人(36.4%)。受访者以已婚(92.3%)、不吸烟(79.0%)、工作10年以上(37.7%)居多。在EMS工作超过十年被确定为抑郁、焦虑和压力的预测因子;腰痛被认为是焦虑的预测因素,而女性性别被认为是压力的预测因素。结论:医院应重视救护人员抑郁、焦虑和压力的来源,并加以适当处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tubo-Ovarian Abscess Following Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Case Report Effectiveness of Positive Therapy in Emotion Regulation and Distress Tolerance in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Effectiveness of Positive Therapy in Emotion Regulation and Distress Tolerance in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Etiology and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Community-Acquired Sepsis in Isfahan, Iran: Impact on Empiric Antibiotic Treatment The Causes of Death among Children Aged 1 to 59 Months in Zahedan University of Medical Sciences from 2018 to 2020 Based on ICD-10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1