Unique Proposals for Limiting Legal Liability and Encouraging Adherence to Ventilator Allocation Guidelines in an Influenza Pandemic

V. Koch, Beth E. Roxland
{"title":"Unique Proposals for Limiting Legal Liability and Encouraging Adherence to Ventilator Allocation Guidelines in an Influenza Pandemic","authors":"V. Koch, Beth E. Roxland","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2174511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a severe influenza pandemic, many more patients would require the use of mechanical ventilators than can be accommodated with current supplies. In order to proactively confront the rationing of resources in preparation for the possibility of severe ventilator scarcity, in 2007, the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law and the New York State Department of Health released a draft guidance document entitled Allocation of Ventilators in an Influenza Pandemic, laying out a comprehensive clinical and ethical framework to guide distribution of ventilators in the event of a severe public health emergency using objective medical criteria, with the ultimate goal of saving the most lives. However, adhering to the Guidelines – despite the significant public health goals contained therein – may expose health care providers and entities to considerable costs and burdens, including the risk of jail time and/or financial penalties, the time and costs of discovery and preparing a case, higher medical malpractice insurance rates, and damage to one’s reputation, unless proper and adequate legal protections are in place. This article addresses the issue of liability for health care workers and entities who adhere to the recommended clinical protocol contained in the Ventilator Guidelines while rendering care in a disaster emergency. We consider the “trigger” for implementing emergency plans – a declaration of a public health or disaster emergency, explore current federal and State law that might offer immunity, defense, or indemnification to certain individuals or entities who provide care in response to that declaration, and offer several unique alternative approaches to mitigate clinicians’ and other entities’ burdens in the event of a lawsuit. The article culminates in recommendations for legislation granting adequate civil and criminal liability protections to health care workers and entities who adhere to the State’s Ventilator Guidelines in a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":410798,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2174511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In a severe influenza pandemic, many more patients would require the use of mechanical ventilators than can be accommodated with current supplies. In order to proactively confront the rationing of resources in preparation for the possibility of severe ventilator scarcity, in 2007, the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law and the New York State Department of Health released a draft guidance document entitled Allocation of Ventilators in an Influenza Pandemic, laying out a comprehensive clinical and ethical framework to guide distribution of ventilators in the event of a severe public health emergency using objective medical criteria, with the ultimate goal of saving the most lives. However, adhering to the Guidelines – despite the significant public health goals contained therein – may expose health care providers and entities to considerable costs and burdens, including the risk of jail time and/or financial penalties, the time and costs of discovery and preparing a case, higher medical malpractice insurance rates, and damage to one’s reputation, unless proper and adequate legal protections are in place. This article addresses the issue of liability for health care workers and entities who adhere to the recommended clinical protocol contained in the Ventilator Guidelines while rendering care in a disaster emergency. We consider the “trigger” for implementing emergency plans – a declaration of a public health or disaster emergency, explore current federal and State law that might offer immunity, defense, or indemnification to certain individuals or entities who provide care in response to that declaration, and offer several unique alternative approaches to mitigate clinicians’ and other entities’ burdens in the event of a lawsuit. The article culminates in recommendations for legislation granting adequate civil and criminal liability protections to health care workers and entities who adhere to the State’s Ventilator Guidelines in a pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在流感大流行中限制法律责任和鼓励遵守呼吸机分配指南的独特建议
在严重的流感大流行中,需要使用机械呼吸机的患者将远远超过现有供应所能容纳的数量。为了积极应对资源配给问题,为可能出现的呼吸机严重短缺做准备,纽约州生命与法律问题工作队和纽约州卫生部于2007年发布了一份题为“流感大流行中呼吸机的分配”的指导文件草案。制定全面的临床和伦理框架,指导在发生严重公共卫生紧急情况时使用客观的医疗标准分发呼吸机,最终目标是挽救最多的生命。然而,遵守《准则》——尽管其中载有重要的公共卫生目标——可能会使卫生保健提供者和实体承担相当大的成本和负担,包括监禁和(或)经济处罚的风险、发现和准备案件的时间和费用、更高的医疗事故保险费率以及个人声誉受损,除非有适当和充分的法律保护。本文讨论了在灾难紧急情况下提供护理时遵守《呼吸机指南》中所包含的推荐临床方案的卫生保健工作者和实体的责任问题。我们考虑了实施应急计划的“触发因素”——宣布公共卫生或灾难紧急状态,探讨了现行的联邦和州法律,这些法律可能会为响应该声明提供护理的某些个人或实体提供豁免权、辩护或赔偿,并提供了几种独特的替代方法,以减轻临床医生和其他实体在诉讼情况下的负担。文章最后提出了立法建议,为在大流行期间遵守国家呼吸机指南的卫生保健工作者和实体提供充分的民事和刑事责任保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Gets Medication-assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, and Does It Reduce Overdose Risk? Evidence from the Rhode Island All-payer Claims Database The Architecture Behind the Malpractice Concept Guidelines Tax Evasion and Illicit Cigarettes in California: Part I – Survey Evidence on Current Behavior Regulatory Exclusivity Revision: Working to Achieve Greater Innovation in Approved New Molecular Entities Leviathan in the Commons: Biomedical Data and the State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1