Tackling the requirements jigsaw puzzle

M. Pinto-Albuquerque, A. Rashid
{"title":"Tackling the requirements jigsaw puzzle","authors":"M. Pinto-Albuquerque, A. Rashid","doi":"10.1109/RE.2014.6912265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key challenge during stakeholder meetings is that of presenting the requirements and conflicts to stakeholders in a way that fosters co-responsibility and co-ownership regarding the conflicts and their resolution. In this paper, we propose a jigsaw puzzle metaphor to make identified conflicts explicit as well as an associated method to utilise this metaphor during stakeholder meetings. The metaphor provides an easy to understand language for stakeholders from otherwise diverse backgrounds. It enables stakeholders to work with a well-understood concept - that of building a system from misshapen pieces. These characteristics foster communication and team work, which improve commitment of stakeholders in co-authoring of requirements and co-responsibility in conflict handling. The gamification of conflict resolution also promotes a relaxed environment, which in turn improves team cooperation and creativity. Our experience in three user studies demonstrates that the jigsaw puzzle indeed improves such co-responsibility and co-ownership when compared with typical text-based representations of requirements.","PeriodicalId":307764,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2014.6912265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

A key challenge during stakeholder meetings is that of presenting the requirements and conflicts to stakeholders in a way that fosters co-responsibility and co-ownership regarding the conflicts and their resolution. In this paper, we propose a jigsaw puzzle metaphor to make identified conflicts explicit as well as an associated method to utilise this metaphor during stakeholder meetings. The metaphor provides an easy to understand language for stakeholders from otherwise diverse backgrounds. It enables stakeholders to work with a well-understood concept - that of building a system from misshapen pieces. These characteristics foster communication and team work, which improve commitment of stakeholders in co-authoring of requirements and co-responsibility in conflict handling. The gamification of conflict resolution also promotes a relaxed environment, which in turn improves team cooperation and creativity. Our experience in three user studies demonstrates that the jigsaw puzzle indeed improves such co-responsibility and co-ownership when compared with typical text-based representations of requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理需求拼图
涉众会议期间的一个关键挑战是以一种促进有关冲突及其解决方案的共同责任和共同所有权的方式向涉众展示需求和冲突。在本文中,我们提出了一个拼图隐喻来明确识别冲突,以及在利益相关者会议期间使用该隐喻的相关方法。这个比喻为来自不同背景的利益相关者提供了一种易于理解的语言。它使涉众能够用一个很好理解的概念来工作——从畸形的部分构建一个系统。这些特征促进了沟通和团队合作,从而提高了涉众在共同编写需求和共同承担冲突处理责任方面的承诺。冲突解决的游戏化也促进了一个轻松的环境,这反过来又提高了团队合作和创造力。我们在三个用户研究中的经验表明,与典型的基于文本的需求表示相比,拼图确实改善了共同责任和共同所有权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated detection and resolution of legal cross references: Approach and a study of Luxembourg's legislation Towards a situation awareness design to improve visually impaired orientation in unfamiliar buildings: Requirements elicitation study Capturing and sharing domain knowledge with business rules lessons learned from a global software vendor Automated support for combinational creativity in requirements engineering Non-functional requirements as qualities, with a spice of ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1