Apical extrusion of root canal filling material during the removal of gutta-percha and resilon

Karolina Vukoje, I. Stojšin, I. Kantardzic, O. Janković
{"title":"Apical extrusion of root canal filling material during the removal of gutta-percha and resilon","authors":"Karolina Vukoje, I. Stojšin, I. Kantardzic, O. Janković","doi":"10.2298/sgs2002091v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Root canal filling material may be extruded during retreatment\n through the apical foramen and cause flare-up or chronic infection. The aim\n of this study was to compare the apical extrusion of gutta-percha and\n resilon filling materials during retreatment using hand and rotary\n instruments. Methods. Sixty extracted single-rooted teeth with single,\n straight canal were selected. Canals were prepared with ProTaper Universal\n rotary system to a size F2. Two groups (30 teeth in each) were filled with\n gutta-percha or resilon points, respectively. In both groups teeth were\n randomly divided into the three subgroups (10 teeth in each), based on the\n instruments used for retreatment: Hedstrom hand files and two rotary groups-\n ProTaper and Twisted File instruments. Apical extrusion was detected\n visually, using a 4-degree scoring system. Mean scores were calculated and\n analyzed statistically (t-test and ANOVA). The level of significance was set\n at p < 0.05. Results. Under tested experimental conditions, the type of\n canal filling material did not have significant effect on the results of\n apical extrusion during retreatment. Significantly more material was\n extruded in the resilon group when manual, Hedstrom file was used (1.80 ?\n 1.13) than rotary ProTaper (0.60 ? 0.70) and Twisted File (0.50 ? 0.71).\n Conclusions. The use of a rotary technique is recomended to minimize apical\n extrusion, especially when resilon obturation material is removed during\n retreatment.","PeriodicalId":180624,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Dental Journal","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2002091v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Root canal filling material may be extruded during retreatment through the apical foramen and cause flare-up or chronic infection. The aim of this study was to compare the apical extrusion of gutta-percha and resilon filling materials during retreatment using hand and rotary instruments. Methods. Sixty extracted single-rooted teeth with single, straight canal were selected. Canals were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary system to a size F2. Two groups (30 teeth in each) were filled with gutta-percha or resilon points, respectively. In both groups teeth were randomly divided into the three subgroups (10 teeth in each), based on the instruments used for retreatment: Hedstrom hand files and two rotary groups- ProTaper and Twisted File instruments. Apical extrusion was detected visually, using a 4-degree scoring system. Mean scores were calculated and analyzed statistically (t-test and ANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. Under tested experimental conditions, the type of canal filling material did not have significant effect on the results of apical extrusion during retreatment. Significantly more material was extruded in the resilon group when manual, Hedstrom file was used (1.80 ? 1.13) than rotary ProTaper (0.60 ? 0.70) and Twisted File (0.50 ? 0.71). Conclusions. The use of a rotary technique is recomended to minimize apical extrusion, especially when resilon obturation material is removed during retreatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杜仲胶和弹性树脂拔除时根管充填材料的根尖挤压
介绍。再治疗时,根管填充物可能通过根尖孔被挤出,引起急性发作或慢性感染。本研究的目的是比较杜仲胶和弹性填充材料在手工和旋转器械再处理时的根尖挤压。方法。选择拔除的单根牙60颗,采用单根直管。采用ProTaper万能旋转系统制备根管,根管尺寸为F2。两组(每组30颗牙齿)分别用杜仲胶或弹性胶填充。根据再治疗使用的器械,两组牙随机分为三个亚组(每组10颗牙):Hedstrom手锉和两个旋转组- ProTaper和Twisted File器械。采用4度评分系统目视检测根尖挤压。计算平均得分并进行统计学分析(t检验和方差分析)。p < 0.05为显著性水平。结果。在试验条件下,根管填充材料的类型对再治疗时根尖挤压的结果没有显著影响。使用手动Hedstrom锉(1.80 ?1.13)比旋转ProTaper (0.60 ?0.70)和Twisted File (0.50 ?0.71)。结论。推荐使用旋转技术,以尽量减少根尖挤压,特别是在再治疗过程中移除弹性封堵材料时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral health effects on the nutritional status of elderly people Oral-health awareness among pregnant women in the region of Republika Srpska The assessment of primary teeth condition in 6 year-old children in Podgorica municipality Quality indicators of dental health care in Serbia The main characteristics and application of the shape memory alloys in orthodontics and endodontics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1