{"title":"Geophysical Case Study of the Iso and New Insco Deposits, Québec, Canada, Part I: Data Comparison and Analysis","authors":"Lizhen Cheng, Richard S. Smith, M. Allard, P. Keating, M. Chouteau, J. Lemieux, Marc A. Vallée, D. Bois, D. Fountain","doi":"10.2113/GSEMG.15.1-2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A test survey using the MEGATEM II airborne electromagnetic system was flown over the Iso and New Insco massive sulfide orebodies in the Rouyn-Noranda mining camp, Canada. The results were compared with data from historical systems (INPUT, DIGHEM) used to discover the deposits. The historical data show that the two deposits have comparable conductances. However, the modern MEGATEMII system reveals that the New Insco deposit has a much slower decay than the Iso deposit, and it is, therefore, interpreted to be more conductive. The MEGATEM II anomaly maps provide estimates of the location, depth, dip, and strike of the two deposits, information that was not available from the historical anomaly maps. The signal-to-noise ratio of the MEGATEM II data is greater than the historical data, yielding more sharply defined anomalies. The investigations also included a comparison between 90 Hz and 30 Hz MEGATEM II data. The 90 Hz data were found to be useful for mapping the less conductive parts of the Iso body, whereas the 30 Hz data demonstrated that the New Insco body is more conductive. Analysis of height attenuation data over the Iso body indicates that the body could be seen by the MEGATEM II system if it were buried an additional 230 m deeper (in highly resistive material). On the other hand, the INPUT system would detect the Iso body only if it were buried no deeper than an additional 60 m. Tests with the transmitter turned off showed that, for this flight, the MEGATEM II system noise levels on the processed data are about 300 pT/s. © 2006 Canadian Institute of Mining,","PeriodicalId":206160,"journal":{"name":"Exploration and Mining Geology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration and Mining Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/GSEMG.15.1-2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
加拿大quamesbec Iso和新Insco矿床地球物理案例研究,第一部分:数据比较与分析
使用MEGATEM II机载电磁系统对加拿大Rouyn-Noranda采矿营地的Iso和New Insco块状硫化物矿体进行了测试测量。结果与发现矿床时使用的历史系统(INPUT, digem)的数据进行了比较。历史资料表明,这两个矿床的电导率相当。然而,现代MEGATEMII系统显示,新Insco矿床的衰变速度比Iso矿床慢得多,因此被解释为更具导电性。MEGATEM II异常图提供了两个矿床的位置、深度、倾角和走向的估计,这些信息是历史异常图所无法提供的。MEGATEM II数据的信噪比大于历史数据,产生更清晰的异常。调查还包括90 Hz和30 Hz MEGATEM II数据之间的比较。90 Hz数据被发现对绘制Iso体的导电性较差的部分有用,而30 Hz数据表明新Insco体的导电性更强。对Iso体的高度衰减数据的分析表明,如果将该体再埋深230米(在高阻材料中),MEGATEM II系统就可以看到该体。另一方面,INPUT系统只能探测到Iso尸体,如果它被埋在不超过60米的深度。关闭发射机的测试表明,在这次飞行中,MEGATEM II系统处理数据的噪声水平约为300 pT/s。©2006加拿大矿业研究所,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。