SEEING MAXIM VIOLATION IN EFL CLASSROOM INTERACTION

Mohammad Soni, S. Dewi, Sulistia Alawiah
{"title":"SEEING MAXIM VIOLATION IN EFL CLASSROOM INTERACTION","authors":"Mohammad Soni, S. Dewi, Sulistia Alawiah","doi":"10.31980/eealjournal.v5i3.2528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In relating with other people, the cooperative principle may be done to make a dialogue run well and efficiently. However, there are chances when speakers have to violate a maxim because of some reason. This study aims to determine the kinds of maxim violations done by the students during classroom interaction and the reasons behind the students violating the maxims. This study used observation and interview methods to collect the data. The study results show that there are three maxims violated by students, namely violating the maxim of quantity, relevance, and quality, with a total of 25 utterances. The students violate the maxim because they want to save face and build someone’s belief. ","PeriodicalId":119882,"journal":{"name":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v5i3.2528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In relating with other people, the cooperative principle may be done to make a dialogue run well and efficiently. However, there are chances when speakers have to violate a maxim because of some reason. This study aims to determine the kinds of maxim violations done by the students during classroom interaction and the reasons behind the students violating the maxims. This study used observation and interview methods to collect the data. The study results show that there are three maxims violated by students, namely violating the maxim of quantity, relevance, and quality, with a total of 25 utterances. The students violate the maxim because they want to save face and build someone’s belief. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语课堂互动中的违反准则现象
在与他人交往时,合作原则可以使对话顺利有效地进行。然而,说话者也有可能因为某种原因而违背格言。本研究旨在确定学生在课堂互动中违反准则的种类,以及学生违反准则的原因。本研究采用观察法和访谈法收集资料。研究结果表明,学生违反了数量准则、关联准则和质量准则三条准则,共计25条。学生们违背了这条格言,因为他们想挽回面子,建立别人的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS, WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES? THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUILDING KNOWLEDGE OF HE FIELD (BKOF) IN TEACHING NARRATIVE TEXT ANALYSIS OF MOOD STRUCTURE IN EFL STUDENTS’ NARRATIVE TEXTS THE USE OF NATURAL DISASTER NEWS TEXT IN MODELLING STAGE TO COMPOSE NEWS ITEM TEXT: AUTHENTIC MATERIAL IN THE SECOND STAGE OF GENRE-BASED APPROACH Barriers of Online Reading Learning Faced by College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1