African Data Protection Laws: Current Regulatory Approaches, Policy Initiatives, and the Way Forward

Patricia Boshe, Moritz Hennemann, Ricarda von Meding
{"title":"African Data Protection Laws: Current Regulatory Approaches, Policy Initiatives, and the Way Forward","authors":"Patricia Boshe, Moritz Hennemann, Ricarda von Meding","doi":"10.54648/gplr2022008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data protection law is experiencing a global rise. Whilst setting the boundaries for public and private data processors, it has become a vital factor for individual protection and innovation alike. The quest for adequate data protection regimes is on-going, not only, but also on the African continent. Since 2001, the majority of African states have drafted and enacted data protection laws. Hard law and soft law instruments have been developed by the African Union and the African Regional Economic Communities. Regularly, EU-style legislation has been used as a source of inspiration – a process actively pushed for by the EU. Against this background, this study evaluates the current state of data protection law and data protection policy in Africa, questions the process of legal transplantation, and favours the consideration of a unique African approach to data protection. Thereby, this study is also a story about alternative routes to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which are – for many reasons – not easy to take.\nAfrica, African Union, African Regional Economic Communities, Data Protection, Privacy, GDPR","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"159 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2022008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data protection law is experiencing a global rise. Whilst setting the boundaries for public and private data processors, it has become a vital factor for individual protection and innovation alike. The quest for adequate data protection regimes is on-going, not only, but also on the African continent. Since 2001, the majority of African states have drafted and enacted data protection laws. Hard law and soft law instruments have been developed by the African Union and the African Regional Economic Communities. Regularly, EU-style legislation has been used as a source of inspiration – a process actively pushed for by the EU. Against this background, this study evaluates the current state of data protection law and data protection policy in Africa, questions the process of legal transplantation, and favours the consideration of a unique African approach to data protection. Thereby, this study is also a story about alternative routes to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which are – for many reasons – not easy to take. Africa, African Union, African Regional Economic Communities, Data Protection, Privacy, GDPR
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲数据保护法:当前的监管方法、政策举措和前进方向
数据保护法正在全球范围内兴起。在为公共和私人数据处理器设定界限的同时,它已成为个人保护和创新的重要因素。对充分的数据保护制度的追求正在进行,不仅如此,在非洲大陆也是如此。自2001年以来,大多数非洲国家都起草并颁布了数据保护法。非洲联盟和非洲区域经济共同体制定了硬法和软法文书。通常,欧盟式的立法被用作灵感的来源——这是欧盟积极推动的一个过程。在此背景下,本研究评估了非洲数据保护法和数据保护政策的现状,质疑了法律移植的过程,并赞成考虑一种独特的非洲数据保护方法。因此,这项研究也是一个关于通用数据保护条例(GDPR)的替代路线的故事,由于许多原因,这些路线不容易采取。非洲,非洲联盟,非洲区域经济共同体,数据保护,隐私,GDPR
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Key Privacy Concepts in the EU and Canada The Personal Data Under the GDPR: Concept, Elements, and Boundaries News: APAC Privacy News Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law Case Note: Strengthening the Role of Google? Recent Developments in the Right to Be Forgotten Case Law of the CJEU (TU and RE v. Google LLC, C-460/20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1